Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: wensleydale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Neil Williams)
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:53:29 GMT
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:20:18 +0100, "Steve"
<stever@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Lets just hope that this is the beginning of the end to this ill-conceived
>undertaking.
I fail to see why it is ill-conceived, other than because the local
NIMBYs do not want a Tesco store. Had said store been constructed,
however, I expect a significant number of them would still have
shopped there, just as the Ormskirk NIMBYs who opposed the local
Safeway (now Morrisons) store did.
I personally do not share the opposition to Tesco that some hold, as
they appear to have grown in the way they have by way of providing
exactly what their customers, including myself as one, want.
Sainsbury's, OTOH, have tended not to do this by way of their poor
stock control, higher prices and poorer range, so haven't done as
well.
That the tunnel collapsed does not make it ill-conceived, either; from
what is being said the design was sound, just not the construction.
Cut-and-cover tunnels[1], after all, are by no means a new thing.
[1] OK, this particular one was less of the "cut" and more of the
"cover", but that's not particularly important, IMO.
Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK
When replying please use neil at the above domain
'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: Steve
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: Guy Gorton
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: Jack Taylor
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- References:
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: Guy Gorton
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: Andrew Bell
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- From: Steve
- Re: Gerrards Cross update
- Prev by Date: Re: First [permanant] bustitution confirmed
- Next by Date: Re: Habeas Corpus (was: Re: More bombs?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Gerrards Cross update
- Next by thread: Re: Gerrards Cross update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|