Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- From: Chris <ngfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:23:41 +0100
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:52:38 -0700 (PDT), Satans Rat wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:37 am, Ian Jackson
<ianREMOVETHISjack...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What a load of bollocks.
Despite my comments, I'm sure you're right!
One would have thought that if they really
wanted a private conversation, they'd have
picked up the telephone instead of moving
to SU23, via the aforementioned secret squirrel
manner that M0PGE (RSGB DRM) seems to be
excusing.
What's wrong with calling CQ on a repeater. Could you for example, point
out the section in the licence where it's forbidden?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- From: Steve Terry
- Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- From: Satans Rat
- Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- References:
- Another poorly trained FL example
- From: Satans Rat
- Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- From: Satans Rat
- Another poorly trained FL example
- Prev by Date: Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- Next by Date: Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- Previous by thread: Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- Next by thread: Re: Another poorly trained FL example
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|