Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- From: "Brian Reay" <see@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 09:25:34 +0100
"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message
news:mqob24ttd57c3uhcog4fhdrrspvb283bhh@xxxxxxxxxx
Brian Reay wrote:
I recall working G3WDR in about 1978- G3 Woolly Dog Roger. I think the
more
"exotic" usage tends to be HF- perhaps some think using "Zanzibar" will
somehow enhance the propagation ;-)
Of course not, but 'Zanzibar' is a well-used and widely-understood
phonetic. Its use can enhance readability.
Given Zanzibar isn't exactly a common word and probably hasn't been since
the 1960s when it was subsumed into (what is now) Tanzania, one wonders why
it is so "well-used and widely-understood" as a phonetic.
Also, not all languages use names for other countries with a common first
letter. Using Scotland for S isn't going to be common usage for a French
speaker!
Given that the NATO alphabet was specifically designed for international use
and is, as I recall, common to that used in Civil Aviation, don't you think
it possible that maybe those organisations have a better informed view of
the pros and cons of the optimal words?
Having said that, I've no wish to see a hard rule on phonetics- I doubt I'd
have recalled G3WDR had he not used a "catchy" set of phonetics (which I
still smile at after near on 30 years!)
--
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- From: Spike
- Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- References:
- Why all the variations in phonetics?
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- From: Brian Reay
- Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- From: Spike
- Why all the variations in phonetics?
- Prev by Date: Re: G4UDK and his antenna
- Next by Date: 80m
- Previous by thread: Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- Next by thread: Re: Why all the variations in phonetics?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|