Re: What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- From: class_a <class_a@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:09:35 -0400
Cheemag wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:17:26 +0100, "Blancmange" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I call upon all self-respecting Radio Hams to....
No self-respecting radio amateur would call himself
a "ham".
Precisely! Does anyone know if the term "ham" as applied to radio amateurs derived from the term "ham" as applied to amateur actors?
I'm curious because I've been reading a Bill Bryson book, "Made in America" and on page 253 he says
"Ham actor, first recorded in 1875, originally alluded to lesser performers' having to use ham fat rather than cold cream to remove their makeup. Soon a second-rate actor was known as a hamfatter, by 1902 he was just a ham".
So, if 'Blancmange' wants to refer to himself as a "ham", or second rate, then that is his decision!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- From: Brian Reay
- Re: What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- References:
- What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- From: Chaney
- Re: What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- From: Blancmange
- What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- Prev by Date: Re: Death of a Radio Company
- Next by Date: Re: Death of a Radio Company
- Previous by thread: Re: What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- Next by thread: Re: What do 40m and 27mhz have in common!!!...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|