Re: The de Menezes Killing

I DONT BELIEVFE HARDLY ANY THING IN PAPERS OR MEDIA unless as in this case
its clearly from official reports

i also would not vbeleive anything a brazilian gov official would say either

so i am not going on what media say,but what is officially in the reports so
far.

again if he did work illegally thats the fault of his employer for
illehgally allowing him to do so,we would have far less illegal work if your
typical capatalist did not employ people and pay no tax and so on,and dont
check crednetials of the peersom employed and indeed pay in cash.

those are the people mainly at fault forr the black market employment there
is,no one can work illegally unless some *** in the uK is going to emply
them.


yes goin on old information that fact about being illegal may be correct but
do we beleive that or not,i dont and either way makes no diffeance as we
know now he did not jum and run as first suggested

unless ones brain is deasd there is only one conclusion met police buggered
up massive on this,especially ian blair and the silly statememnts he made to
the press in ealry press confeences he should of said,we have no infomation
at the time,but of courxse then the infomation hungy media and uk public
would not like that eitheer

the media should also kee[p there traps shut till proper information comes
there way and not have a wannbee star on all channels ytelling us with a big
smile on his face what he saw,a load of bollocks is all that main so called
witness saw.

at least now we can see a proper enquiry is taking place

<lucifer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:72a6g1pb5k3ssj1gqv05e00e12umcnt9rc@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:06:06 GMT, "PromaBoss" <Promaboss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>one less illegal
>>
>>that --------------- has not been confirmed
>
> Do try and keep up with the news sunshine.
>
> According to those same newspapers - which you and others place so
> much credence in when their reports correlate with your own blinkered
> opinions. He was originally allowed into the UK on a 'student' visa.
> That expired two years ago and at that time he should have left. He
> didn't leave, he stayed on and worked illegally.
>
> The newspapers claim to have verified those are facts with the
> Brazilian authorities.
>
> Got it now?
>
> Old Nick.
>


.

Loading