Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- From: MM <kylix_is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:50:18 +0100
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 03:29:47 -0700 (PDT), Jon° <raystap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Aug 16, 11:25 am, Jon° <rays...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 16, 10:53 am, Logician <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:57 am, Andy <andrewrichardwainwri...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Should all under-25s be reversably steralised? Whilst the Chinese one-
child-per-family law has been reasonably successful in controlling
population growth, it has raised the problems of ethnic cleansing ,
sex selection and spoilt children through lack of siblings. Personally
I believe every reasonably responsible / law-abiding woman and man has
the right to have children- and nor should their be a limit on the
size of family for responsible parents. But many young adults usually
don't know why they actually want a family other than for purely
hormonal reasons.
A (female) friend of mine - a superb mother but had her first child
taken into care - suggested the fitting of contraceptive devices to
all women under 25 (this could be waived with a good medical reason of
course)
As well as tackling the global population crisis, it could prevent the
heartache of children being taken into care , reduce divorce cause by
the stress of too early parenting , and improve child welfare as older
parents are usually more responsible when it comes to caring for their
children and family planning. Any thoughts?
People for decades have advocated birth control beyound the normal
government ramblings about condom use.
It has always been linked to race and government control and received
bad press.
Obvious controls would be the preventation of criminals from having
children, and controls related to intelligence, disabilities, social
standing, physical fitness, and character.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
To Logician:
Here we go the true face of socialism/communism and fascism???Most
left-wingers are, under their cloaks of liberalism????.Fascists????.
Fascists who wish to impose their left-wing anti-freedom laws on all.
You show here that you would use breeding controls to produce the
population that you and you evil compatriots long for??????.You are
not satisfied with trying to change the face of Europe by importing
third-world people by the millions????..You wish to create a new
fascist master state of communist filth, with a man like Pol Pot
running the show, by controlled breeding methods as well.
You are evil ?under the sun? or ?under the moon?????Time to gird our
loins and take you on!
New Labour is definitely fascist-lite now. Just as Norman Mailer said
how Amerika was becoming pre-fascist under Bush. I dread to think what
might happen if New Labour won a fourth term.
MM
.
- References:
- Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- From: Logician
- Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- From: Jon°
- Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- From: Jon°
- Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- Prev by Date: Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- Next by Date: Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- Previous by thread: Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- Next by thread: Re: Should all under-25s be reversably steralised?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
