Re: Men will have to discover some cojones to counteract the rise of female domination

On 1 Oct, 09:43, MM <kylix...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In yesterday's Daily Telegraph a particular article attracted some
very thoughtful comments, which can be found here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/education/3101958/
Paedophile-hysteria-preventing-men-applying-to-work-in-primary-schools.html

http://tinyurl.com/3horwz

The article is worth reading on its own, but here are extracts from
some of the comments:

<quote>
The growing numerical superiority of female educationalists ( some
still think of themselves as 'teachers' ) ensures a curriculum
developed from a female mentality.

This precludes any balancing male input, ensuring the continuing
female dominated progression as new generations arise.

By ensuring a dumbing-down of ALL pupils being masked by carefully
crafted hidden 'standards' reductions, the resultant female level of
social responsibility has been and continues to be below the level
where 'society' is capable of coping with everyday problems.

The frustrations of the lower-level 'educated' female are then very
simply expressed by irrational 'anger' against all males, and from
their classroom and playground-learned childish methods of projecting
severe mental cruelty of a specific kind males find impossible to deal
with ( they are damned if they object and damned if they don't ) these
mentally neanderthal female types simply scream "PEDO !" repeatedly,
knowing they are probably safe in their cowardice, as most of the
defensive 'aggression' has been carefully eliminated by 'the system'.

Men probably find this offensive !

Men probably can aim for better ways of earning a living than becoming
walking targets for the low-life emerging from 'our' educational
'system', rabble-rowsed on front pages throughout the daily Red-Top
tabloids.

Reap that which you sow !
</quote>

Another comment goes like this:

<quote>
Years ago I started a PGCE course and quickly discovered I was not cut
out to teach. But my teaching practice was a lesson to me. I
discovered that female students of 13 and upwards were very aware of
their sexuality and flaunted themselves, usually as a way of trying to
unsettle males like me. (I was quite immune to it, by the way) What
concerned me was that it would only take an argument, or an attempt to
bring discipline into the classroom to upset these children, whose
first recourse would inevitably be revenge. The easiest way to do this
would be to claim that I had molested them or behaved improperly. It
happens. Accusations are made that prove to be false and lives, the
lives of dedicated male teachers, are ruined.

Why should anybody risk it?

Society has whipped up hysteria about these issues, and this is the
result.

By the way, what really made me decide to leave teaching was not the
children, but the very stupid,openly Socialist PGCE tutors who were
obsessed with political correctness.
</quote>

Yet another:

<quote>
What I am not really sure about is exactly why we had generations of
teachers who produced the pioneers of medicine, engineering,
exploration, science, philosophy and so on that Britain is famous for,
none of whom had criminal record checks and very very very few of whom
were found to be paedophiles - yet now we need all these checks and
investigations because those nasty 'men' cannot be trusted.

When did THAT happen? I am 40 and most of my teachers were male
throughout my (private boarding school) education and (private)
college tertiary education.

Never once between the age of 7 and 21 did I see, hear, suspect or
imagine that any one of those good men was in any way behaving
inappropriately towards one of their charges.

My parents never expressed concern that my teachers (or those of my 3
brothers) had not been background checked etc.

Just WHY is all this suddenly necessary? As a man, I would never
consent to being investigated like that unless I wanted a job as a
spy. I am not at all surprised that other men feel the same way. It
presumes that one is a paedophile and/or criminal unless it can be
proved otherwise and is therefore inherently offensive.
</quote>

---------------------------------------------------------------

The problem, it seems, is the female component. On Friday this week on
the Tonight programme at 8:00 pm Esther Rantzen will explain how she
helped to create this "politically correct monster" (her words). So
she seems to realise that this hysteria has not only gone too far in
demonising mainly men, all men, but is actually harming children by
not giving them a full rounded childhood and stultifying their
upbringing.

I wonder whether her's is a lone voice or whether other women
"educationalists" will start supporting her point of view. Or, taking
the opposing view, shouting her down. Women, after all, can be real
bitches some times, amongst their own kind. But this is a very
difficult mountain to climb for men, because, basically, it means that
we have to start calling a spade a spade and telling it like it is.
This is something that usually goes down among the feminazis among us
(pretty much all women nowadays, although perhaps some more
reluctantly than others) like a lead balloon. The trouble is, the
feminazis have the law, the government and the police on their side.
They have all the guns, whereas men have been left with blowpipes and
arrows.

This, of course, all happened under the great scheme of things, gender
equality, which is so obviously a flawed concept, but allowed free
rein to political correctness. Forever we read about how women cannot
break through the glass ceiling. How that has become a concrete
ceiling for some. Forever I have been arguing that men are ideal for
some activities and women for others. As one would never use a hammer
where a saw is needed, so should men be channeled into the kinds of
activities that they have been practising for 500,000 years, and women
should be reminded of where THEIR channels have traditionally been and
to get back and rediscover them. Weigh up 500,000 against 40 (since
the 1970s) and extrapolate how bad it's going to get if this "gender
equality" fiasco is allowed to continue without restriction. There
never will be true gender equality anyway. It's a misnomer. There can
be no such thing. There are fundamental biological and, more
importantly, psychological differences between males and females in
all species and we humans would do well to recognise the differences
and work with them instead of trying to destroy them in the name of
political correctness.

Oh, and this has nothing to do with paying women and men the same for
the same type of work. That, of course, is a given. The recipe is
quite simple, in my view: Men are the breadwinners, women are the
homemakers. Men fight to defend their families, women are the
nurturers whose job it is to create and build the family. The sooner
we get back to that original millennia old concept, the better it will
be for children and for society.

MM

The rule of law states:

1) no person is above the law
2) all persons should have equal access to the law
3) all persons should have equal protection from the law

That means, that those accused of any crime, including child abuse and
terrorism, have the right to be protected from allegations of such
offences unless proved guilty in a court of law beyond all reasonable
doubt.

It is a TRUE FACT that most teachers and youth leaders will be accused
of child abuse during a 40-year career. Most such allegations turn out
to be a simple misunderstanding or mental illness of the
"victim" (quite common during puberty) .. of course all such
allegations should be taken seriously, as in a few cases there is
genuine abuse- but to hold completely unproven "gossip" against the
career of any worker is a breach of their rights. Adults have as much
rights as kids.

The tabloid paedo-hysteria has indeed put a lot of people off working
with kids, especially volunteers. And then they wonder why kids go
around doing drugs and knifing each other.......................
.

Relevant Pages