Re: UK Monkey Men.
- From: Jon° <oh_jonjon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 2, 12:37 pm, Poldie <_.@._> wrote:
Jon° wrote:
On Aug 2, 1:07 am, Poldie <_.@._> wrote:
Jon° wrote:
On Aug 1, 6:02 pm, Poldie <_.@._> wrote:Are you tripping?
Jon° wrote:As always Poldie, the fat woman lover and the adorer of naked
Chimps, genetically, are very close to some sub-human speciesAren't those areas where there are a lot of Asian people? Asians are
according to new genetic research. They shared a common ancestor many
millions of years ago, scientists from the Wayne State University,
School of Medicine, Detroit, US, claim. They examined key genes in sub-
humans and several ape species and found the sub-human’s "life code"
to be 99.4% the same as many monkeys..
A quick trip to Brent, Brixton, Bradford, Luton, East-End-London,
Inner-City-Manchester/Liverpool and the other invaded areas of the
UK, may help you if you wish to investigate and help in this
important new research that is taking place.
doing rather better than non-Asians in education at the moment, aren't
they genius?
I think you're a bit out of your depth with comments about DNA and
evolution. You might want to read up on it a little. One starting
point might be the book "Guns, Germs & Steel" by Jared Diamond
aggressive bouncers tries to confuse the issues .
If my post is read correctly it will be seen that I make no claims toWhat's a `sub-human species`? Do they explain that?- Hide quoted text -
have an in depth knowledge of DNA. Whatever I have posted is from
the genetic research carried out by the Wayne State University and
the school of medicine Detroit. However you, as always, have
attempted to , again, confuse issues by insinuating that I am out of
my depth……………….The truth though is that you are out of your depth, you
are unable to take on real academics’ from respected institutions…….So
you shoot the messenger!
- Show quoted text -
I have no requirement to do so. Whilst you are around. You are a
perfect example.
And I'm genetically different to you? And `sub-humans` are different to
you? Are you sure you've read that book?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You must read the book I suggested to you in a previous post. It will
teach you not to start a sentence with a conjunction.
Look at the following sentence. The cat AND the dog were friendly.
This is an example of the correct usage of AND. Other conjunctions
are: "and," "but," "or," "nor," "for," "so," or "yet". Try to use
these words as co-ordinating conjunctions’ if you really want to
improve your image.
Do try to get hold of my suggested reading if you wish to rid yourself
of your wretched inferiority complex. Being unable to write decent
English is one of the main causes for this nasty affliction.
.
- References:
- Re: UK Monkey Men.
- From: Jon°
- Re: UK Monkey Men.
- From: Jon°
- Re: UK Monkey Men.
- Prev by Date: Re: for moonbats only....on the fictional tv programme...."The Great Global Warming Swindle"
- Next by Date: Re: Captain of HMS Cornwall walks the plank
- Previous by thread: Re: UK Monkey Men.
- Next by thread: Re: UK Monkey Men.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|