Re: UK Monkey Men.
- From: Jon° <oh_jonjon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 2, 12:37 pm, Poldie <_.@._> wrote:
Jon° wrote:
On Aug 2, 1:07 am, Poldie <_.@._> wrote:
Jon° wrote:
On Aug 1, 6:02 pm, Poldie <_.@._> wrote:Are you tripping?
Jon° wrote:As always Poldie, the fat woman lover and the adorer of naked
Chimps, genetically, are very close to some sub-human speciesAren't those areas where there are a lot of Asian people? Asians are
according to new genetic research. They shared a common ancestor many
millions of years ago, scientists from the Wayne State University,
School of Medicine, Detroit, US, claim. They examined key genes in sub-
humans and several ape species and found the sub-human’s "life code"
to be 99.4% the same as many monkeys..
A quick trip to Brent, Brixton, Bradford, Luton, East-End-London,
Inner-City-Manchester/Liverpool and the other invaded areas of the
UK, may help you if you wish to investigate and help in this
important new research that is taking place.
doing rather better than non-Asians in education at the moment, aren't
they genius?
I think you're a bit out of your depth with comments about DNA and
evolution. You might want to read up on it a little. One starting
point might be the book "Guns, Germs & Steel" by Jared Diamond
aggressive bouncers tries to confuse the issues .
If my post is read correctly it will be seen that I make no claims toWhat's a `sub-human species`? Do they explain that?- Hide quoted text -
have an in depth knowledge of DNA. Whatever I have posted is from
the genetic research carried out by the Wayne State University and
the school of medicine Detroit. However you, as always, have
attempted to , again, confuse issues by insinuating that I am out of
my depth……………….The truth though is that you are out of your depth, you
are unable to take on real academics’ from respected institutions…….So
you shoot the messenger!
- Show quoted text -
I have no requirement to do so. Whilst you are around. You are a
perfect example.
And I'm genetically different to you? And `sub-humans` are different to
you? Are you sure you've read that book?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Perhaps you would like to re-post above and try to get your "And-In"
more successfully.
The differences between being pedagogic and academic, seems to allude
you. I suggest that you read a book on the rudiments of syntactic-
grammar. Hopefully you will follow my suggestion, if you do, perhaps
we may see your morphemes combined in the same order as they would be
if they were separate words in a corresponding construction.
Try reading a simply written book on "English For Beginners". May I
suggest you try,
"Perfect Written English" by Chris West. I believe it is in paper-
back now, so it will not break your bank.
I only give these suggestions to you, because I have always had, a
deep feeling for the afflicted under-dog.
.
- References:
- Re: UK Monkey Men.
- From: Jon°
- Re: UK Monkey Men.
- From: Jon°
- Re: UK Monkey Men.
- Prev by Date: Re: UK nuclear energy deal collapses
- Next by Date: Re: UK nuclear energy deal collapses
- Previous by thread: Re: UK Monkey Men.
- Next by thread: Re: UK Monkey Men.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|