Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- From: Mel Rowing <mel.rowing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 31, 12:50 pm, Maria <oldwo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Talking of what things ought to be, one is required to trespass in order
to make a purchase which benefits the company - morally they must also
be prepared to tolerate a trespass in a case where the purchaser
requires further service.
Unless they enter outside trading hours or are told by a repeonsible
person that the shop is closed for whatever reason, nobody enters a
shop as a trespasser.
It's akin to me knocking on your door and you inviting me in. From
that moment on I have the status of invitee.
When a proprietor opens a shop and by his actions (advertising, window
display, promotion etc.) makes it perfectly clear what the intention
of his premises is then he offers an invitation to all and sundry who
become invitees by default.
Of course invitee status can be withdrawn at any time. From that
moment on the invitee becomes a trespasser and, if requested to do so,
must leave as soon as reasonably practicable. Neither is being an
invitee a defence against disorderly or abusive behaviour.
.
- References:
- Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- From: MM
- Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- From: Mel Rowing
- Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- From: Maria
- Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- Prev by Date: Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- Next by Date: Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- Previous by thread: Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- Next by thread: Re: Someone had DNA sample taken for complaining?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
