Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: FriarTuck <none@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:42:19 GMT
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:49:53 +0000, William Black wrote:
"FriarTuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EKQxj.22587$%W6.5265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:56:13 +0000, William Black wrote:
"FriarTuck" <none@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:K_Pxj.22573$%W6.9541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:55:57 -0800, Christopher wrote:
MP's view the ordinary people of Britain as nothing more than 'cash
cattle'.
We don't need another Cromwell banning christmas and dancing etc...
though his justified exasperation with parliament is still tangible
today....
He banned neither Christmas nor dancing, indeed he danced until dawn
at his daughter's wedding.
You are thinking of the English Republic that preceded his coup.
sounds like some conflicting claims on that then..... maybe I am wrong
and am a victim of royalist propaganda from after the reformation....
More likely a Victorian rewriting of history.
They did a lot of that.
so very very royalist propaganda then... were the royals ever so popular
as in the days of the glorious reich, I mean empire.....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: FriarTuck
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: William Black
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- References:
- Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: Christopher
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: FriarTuck
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: William Black
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: FriarTuck
- Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- From: William Black
- Britain needs a new Cromwell
- Prev by Date: Re: PRINCE HARRY on the Front Line
- Next by Date: Re: PRINCE HARRY on the Front Line
- Previous by thread: Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- Next by thread: Re: Britain needs a new Cromwell
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|