Re: PRINCE HARRY on the Front Line

On Feb 29, 12:10 pm, shaun.jameson.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Shaun) wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:37:08 -0800 (PST), Mel Rowing





<mel.row...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 29, 11:33=A0am, Blue <b...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How do you feel about it poll:

1. 'Oh NOO poor Prince Harry, he's in danger, he put himself
=A0 =A0 =A0in harms way. What would Diana think. He should not be there.'

2. 'Oh great now the drnken debauching spare has added murder
=A0 =A0 to his list. I hope he gets shot to pieces and they'll
=A0 =A0 be one less royal scrounger.

3. 'Blah'.

He's serving his country.

What did you ever do for it?

Milllions of people serve their country everyday without feeling the
need to kill foreigners for politcal reasons

Quite but this guy isn't one of them!

Soldiering is an honourable profession.

This country would have a far different history than it has but for
them and a far worse one too!

Soldiers do not choose their engagements.

It amuses me that those who criticize operations in Iraq on the basis
that they are, allegedly, not sanctioned by the UN are the very same
people who criticize the operations in Afghanistan which are UN
mandated and carried out through NATO of whch the UK is a member.

When a poster calls for and shows a readiness to celebrate the death
of any British soldier who does no more than his duty in an operation
authorised by his properly constituted government viz:

" 'Oh great now the drnken debauching spare has added murder
to his list. I hope he gets shot to pieces and they'll
be one less royal scrounger."

Then he deserves to be taken to task his loyalty comes under question.
His card should be well and truly marked.

.