Re: What the EU Constitution says
- From: "Arthur2" <pangga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:45:23 -0000
"DVH" <dvh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4761b609$0$514$bed64819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An analysis by Prof Anthony Coughlan.
Today the European Union leaders signed the Lisbon Treaty. This treaty
gives the EU the constitutional form of a state. These are the ten most
important things the Lisbon Treaty does:
1. It establishes a legally new European Union in the constitutional form
of a supranational European State.
2. It empowers this new European Union to act as a State vis-a-vis other
States and its own citizens.
3. It makes us all citizens of this new European Union.
4. To hide the enormity of the change, the same name - European Union -
will be kept while the Lisbon Treaty changes fundamentally the legal and
constitutional nature of the Union.
5. It creates a Union Parliament for the Union's new citizens.
6. It creates a Cabinet Government of the new Union.
7. It creates a new Union political President.
8. It creates a civil rights code for the new Union's citizens.
9. It makes national Parliaments subordinate to the new Union.
10. It gives the new Union self-empowerment powers.
1. The Lisbon Treaty establishes a legally quite new European Union. This
is a Union in the constitutional form of a supranational European State:
The Treaty gives this new Union a State Constitution which is identical in
its legal effects to the EU Constitution that French and Dutch voters
rejected in their 2005 referendums.
It does this by amending the two existing basic European Treaties, the
"Treaty on European Union" (TEU) and the "Treaty Establishing the European
Community" (TEC). The former retains its name, while the latter is renamed
the "Treaty on the Functioning of the Union" (TFU). These two amended
Treaties become the de facto Constitution of the new Union which they
constitute or establish, although they are not called a Constitution. The
EU has thus been given a Constitution indirectly rather than in direct
form, as had been proposed in the Treaty which the peoples of France and
Holland rejected in 2005.
The provision of the Lisbon Treaty that "The Union shall replace and
succeed the European Community" (Art.1.3, amended TEU) makes absolutely
clear that the post-Lisbon Union will be quite a new entity, as the
European Community of which our countries are all currently members ceases
to exist.
2. The Treaty empowers this new European Union to act as a State vis-a-vis
other States and its own citizens:
To understand the change introduced by the Lisbon Treaty one needs to
understand that what we call the European Union today is not a State. It
is not even a legal or corporate entity in its own right, for it does not
have legal personality. The name "European Union" at present is a
descriptive term for all the relations between its 27 Member States.
At present these relations cover both the "European Community" area where
supranational European law is operative, and the "intergovernmental" areas
of foreign policy and justice and home affairs where Member States
cooperate with one another on the basis of keeping their sovereignty and
where European laws do not apply.
The Lisbon Treaty changes this situation by creating a constitutionally
and legally quite new EU, while retaining the same name, the "Union".
Unlike the present European Union, this legally new EU will be separate
from and superior to its Member States, just as the USA is separate from
and superior to California or New York, or Federal Germany to Bavaria or
Brandenburg.
This new European Union can sign treaties with other States in all areas
of its competence and conduct itself as a State in the international
community of States. It can speak at the United Nations on agreed foreign
policy positions of its Member States, just as in the days of the Soviet
Union the USSR had a UN seat while Russia, Ukraine and Byelorussia had UN
seats also.
The Lisbon Treaty also gives the EU a political President, a Foreign
Minister - to be called a High Representative - a diplomatic corps and a
Public Prosecutor. The new EU will accede to the European Convention on
Human Rights, as all other European States have already done, including
those outside the EU.
The Treaty also sets out the principle of the primacy of the laws of the
new Union over the laws of its Member States (Declaration 27). The new EU
makes the majority of laws for its Member States each year and under the
Lisbon Treaty the new Union, which will replace the European Community,
gets further power to make laws or take decisions by qualified majority
vote in relation to some 68 new policy areas or matters where Member
States currently have a veto.
3. The Treaty makes us all real citizens of this new European Union for
the first time, instead of our being notional or honorary European
"citizens" as at present:
A State must have citizens and one can only be a citizen of a State.
Citizenship of the European Union at present is stated to "complement"
national citizenship, the latter being clearly primary, not least because
the present EU is not a State. It is not even a corporate entity that can
have individuals as members, not to mind citizens.
By transforming the legal character of the Union, the Lisbon Treaty
transforms the meaning of Union citizenship. Article.17b.1 TEC/TFU replace
the word "complement" in the sentence "Citizenship of the Union shall
complement national citizenship", so that the new sentence reads:
"Citizenship of the Union shall be in addition to national citizenship."
This gives the 500 million inhabitants of the present EU Member States a
real separate citizenship from citizenship of their national States for
the first time. It gives a treble citizenship to citizens of Bavaria and
Brandenburg within a Federal State like Germany. The rights and duties
attaching to this citizenship of the new Union are be superior to those
attaching to citizenship of one's own national State in any case of
conflict between the two, because of the superiority of EU law over
national law and constitutions.
As most States only recognise that one can have a single citizenship,
henceforth it is one's Union citizenship which will be regarded by other
countries as primary and superior to one's national citizenship.
Although we will be given rights as EU citizens, we should not forget that
as real citizens of the new European Union we also owe it the normal
citizens' duty of obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority,
which will be a higher authority than that of our national States and
constitutions.
Member States retain their national constitutions, but they are
subordinate to the new Union Constitution. As such they will no longer be
constitutions of sovereign States, just as the various local states of the
USA retain their constitutions although they are subordinate to the
Federal US Constitution.
4. To hide the enormity of the change, the same name - European Union -
will be kept while the Lisbon Treaty changes fundamentally the legal and
constitutional nature of the Union. By this means the importance of the
proposed change is kept hidden from the people:
The change in the constitutional nature of both the Union and its Member
States will be made in three legal steps that are set out in the Treaty:
(a) It establishes a European Union with an entire legal personality and
independent corporate existence in all Union areas for the first time, so
that it can function as a State vis-a-vis other States and in relation to
its own citizens (Art.32, amended TEU);
(b) This new European Union replaces the existing European Community and
takes over all of its powers and institutions. It takes over as well the
"intergovernmental" powers over foreign policy and crime, justice and home
affairs which at present are outside the scope of European law, leaving
only the Common Foreign and Security Policy outside the scope of its
supranational power (Art.11.1, amended TEU).
It thereby gives a unified constitutional structure to the new Union which
it will constitute or establish. The European Community disappears and all
spheres of public policy will come within the scope of supranational EU
law-making either actually or potentially, as in any constitutionally
unified State. (One says "potentially" because further inter-State
treaties would be required to transfer the minority of law-making powers
still remaining with the Member States to the new Union in the future, or
to shift powers back from the supranational level to the Member States -
something that has never happened up to now. Supranational legislative
acts would not yet be adopted in the sphere of Common Foreign and Security
Policy and new treaties would be needed to change that. However the
Commission, a key supranational body, will through the High
Representative/Foreign Minister gain the right of initiative in the
foreign policy field, so that even in the light of Art.11.1 TEU a de facto
"supranationality" will be attained here);
(c) It makes us all real citizens of the new Federal Union which the
Treaty establishes, with all the implications of that for downgrading our
present personal status as citizens of sovereign nation States and
superseding it by citizenship of a supranational European Federation.
5. It creates a Union Parliament for the Union's new citizens:
The Lisbon Treaty/EU Constitution makes Members of the European
Parliament, who at present are "representatives of the peoples of the
Member States", into "representatives of the Union's citizens" (Art.9a,
amended TEU). This illustrates the constitutional shift the Treaty makes
from the present European Union of national States and peoples to the new
Federal Union of European citizens and their national states - the latter
henceforth reduced constitutionally and politically to provincial or
regional status.
6. It creates a Cabinet Government of the new Union:
The Treaty turns the European Council, the quarterly "summit" meetings of
Member State Heads of State or Government, into an institution of the new
Union, so that its acts and failures to act will, like all other Union
institutions, be subject to legal review by the EU Court of Justice.
Legally speaking these summit meetings of the European Council will no
longer be "intergovernmental" gatherings of Prime Ministers and Presidents
outside supranational European structures. As part of the new EU´s
institutional framework, they will instead be constitutionally required to
"promote the Union's values, advance its objectives, serve its interests"
and "ensure the consistency, effectiveness and continuity of its policies
and actions." (Art. 9 amended TEU). They will also "define the general
political direction and priorities thereof" (Art.9b).
The European Council thus becomes in effect the Cabinet Government of the
new Federal EU, and its individual members will be primarily obliged to
represent the Union to their Member States rather than their Member States
to the Union.
7. It creates a new Union political President:
The federalist character of the European Council "summit" meetings in the
proposed new Union structure is further underlined by the provision which
gives the European Council a permanent political President for up to five
years (two and a half years renewable once) (Art.9b).
There is no gathering of Heads of State or Government in any other
international context which maintains the same chairman or president for
several years while individual national prime ministers and prime
ministers come and go.
The federal character of the new President is emphasised also by the
Treaty provision which forbids that person from holding any national
office and which lays down that he/she shall "ensure the external
representation of the Union".
8. It creates a civil rights code for the new Union's citizens:
All States have codes setting out the rights of their citizens. The EU
Charter of Fundamental Rights will be that. It will be made legally
binding by the new Treaty and will be an essential part of the new Union's
constitutional structure (Art.6, amended TEU).
The Charter is stated to be binding on the Union's own institutions and on
Member States in implementing Union law. This limitation to EU law and to
the EU institutions is unrealistic however, because
(a) the principles of primacy and uniformity of Union law mean that Member
States will not only be bound by the Fundamental Rights Charter when
implementing EU law, but also through the "interpretation and application
of their national laws in conformity with Union laws" (v. ECJ judgements
in the Factortame, Simmenthal and other law cases); and because
(b) the Charter sets out fundamental rights in areas in which the Union
has currently no competence, e.g. outlawing the death penalty, asserting
citizens' rights in criminal proceedings and various other areas.
This gives a new and extensive human and civil rights jurisdiction to the
EU Court of Justice and makes that Court the final body to decide what
people's rights are in the vast area covered by European law, as against
national Supreme Courts and the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg - the
latter Court serving all other European States, not just the EU members -
which are our final fundamental rights Courts today.
The EU Commission can be expected in time to propose European laws to
ensure the uniform implementation and guarantee of the rights provisions
of the Charter throughout the Member States, even in areas which are
basically outside the scope of Union competence. American constitutional
history provides ample evidence of the radical federalising potential of
the fundamental rights jurisdiction of the US Supreme Court.
9. It makes national Parliaments subordinate to the new Union:
The Treaty underlines the subordinate role of National Parliaments in the
constitutional structure of the new Union by stating that "National
Parliaments shall contribute actively to the good functioning of the
Union" by various means set out in Article 8c, amended TEU. The imperative
"shall" implies an obligation on National Parliaments to further the
interests of the new Union.
National Parliaments have in any case already lost most of their
law-making powers to the EC/EU. The citizens who elect them have lost
their powers to decide these laws too.
The provision of the Treaty that if one-third of the National Parliaments
object to a Commission proposal, the Commission must reconsider it but not
necessarily abandon it, is small compensation for the loss of democracy
involved by the loss of 68 vetoes by National Parliaments as a result of
other changes proposed by the Lisbon Treaty.
10. It gives the new Union self-empowerment powers:
These are shown by:
(a) the enlarged scope of the Flexibility Clause (Art.308 TEC/TFU),
whereby if the Treaty does not provide the necessary powers to enable the
new Union attain its very wide objectives, the Council may take
appropriate measures by unanimity. The Lisbon Treaty extends this
provision from the area of operation of the common market to all of the
new Union's policies directed at attaining its much wider objectives. The
Flexibility Clause has been widely used to extend EU law-making over the
years;
(b) the proposed "Simplified Treaty Revision Procedure" which permits the
Prime Ministers and Presidents on the European Council to shift Union
decision-taking from unanimity to qualified majority voting in the "Treaty
on the Functioning of the Union" (Art.33.6, amended TEU), where the
population size of certain Member States is likely to be decisive; and
(c) the several "ratchet-clauses" or "passerelles" which would allow the
European Council to switch from unanimity to majority voting in certain
specified areas such as judicial cooperation in civil matters
(Art.69d.3.2), in criminal matters (Art.69f.2), in relation to the EU
Public Prosecutor (69i.4), and in a number of other areas.
Conclusion:
It is hard to think of any major function of a State which the new
European Union will not have once the Lisbon Treaty is ratified. The main
one seems to be the power to make its Member States go to war against
their will. The Treaty does provide that the EU may go to war while
individual Member States may "constructively abstain".
The obligation on the Union to "provide itself with the means necessary to
attain its objectives and carry through its policies" (Art. TEC/TFU 269
a), which means raising its "own resources" to finance them, may be
regarded as conferring on it wide taxation and revenue-raising powers,
although these will require unanimity to exercise. Currently public
expenditure and the tax measures needed to finance it remain
overwhelmingly at national state level. This is because such social
services as health, education, social security and public housing, as well
as defence, policing and public transport - the government functions which
cost most money - are still mainly at this level.
However the new European Union will have its own government, with a
legislative, executive and judicial arm, its own political President, its
own citizens and citizenship, its own human and civil rights code, its own
currency, economic policy and revenue, its own international treaty-making
powers, foreign policy, foreign minister, diplomatic corps and United
Nations voice, its own crime and justice code and Public Prosecutor. It
already possesses such normal State symbols as its own flag, anthem, motto
and annual official holiday.
As regards the State authority of the new Union, it is embodied in the
Union' s own executive, legislative and judicial institutions: the
European Council, Council of Ministers, Commission, Parliament and Court
of Justice. It is also embodied in the Member States and their authorities
as they implement and apply EU law and interpret and apply national law in
conformity with Union law. Member States will be constitutionally required
to do this under the Lisbon Treaty. Thus EU "State authorities" as
represented for example by soldiers and policemen in EU uniforms on our
streets are not needed as such.
Allowing for the special features of each case, all the classical Federal
States which have been formed on the basis of power being surrendered by
lower constituent states to a higher Federal authority have developed in a
gradual way, just as has happened in the case of the European Union.
Nineteenth century Germany, the USA, Canada and Australia are classical
examples. Indeed the EU has accumulated its powers much more rapidly than
some of these Federal States - in the short historical time-span of some
sixty years.
The key difference between these classical Federations and the new
European Union is that the former, once their people had settled, share a
common language, history, culture and national solidarity that gave them a
democratic basis and made their State authority popularly legitimate and
acceptable. All stable States are founded on such communities where people
speak a common language and mutually identify with one another as one
people - a "We". In the EU however there is no European people or "demos",
except statistically. The Lisbon Treaty is an attempt to construct a
highly centralised European Federation artificially, from the top down,
out of Europe's many nations, peoples and States, without their free
consent and knowledge.
If there were to be a European Federation that is democratic and
acceptable, the minimum constitutional requirement for it would be that
its laws would be initiated and approved by the directly elected
representatives of the people either in the European Parliament or the
National Parliaments. Unfortunately, neither the Lisbon Treaty nor the EU
Constitution it establishes contain any such proposal.
By giving a Constitution indirectly rather than directly to the new
European Union which it will establish, the Lisbon Treaty sets in place
what Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt has called the "capstone of a
European Federal State". For the Euro-federalist political elites who have
been driving this process over decades this is the culmination of what
started nearly 60 years ago when the 1950 Schuman Declaration, which is
commemorated annually on 9 May, Europe Day, proclaimed the European Coal
and Steel Community to be the "first step in the federation of Europe".
The peoples of Europe do not want this kind of highly centralized Federal
European Union whose most striking feature is that it is run virtually
entirely by committees of politicians, bureaucrats and judges, none of
whom are directly elected by the people. The Constitutional Treaty setting
it up has already been rejected by the French and the Dutch in 2005. As
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has admitted, the Prime Ministers and
Presidents have agreed among themselves on no account to have referendums
on the Renamed Constitutional Treaty, for that would be rejected
everywhere again.
Only the Irish are enabled to have their say on it because of the
constitutional case taken before the Supreme Court by the late Raymond
Crotty. That action by that great Irishman stopped the State's politicians
of that time from ratifying a previous European Treaty, the Single
European Act, in an unconstitutional manner.
This document has been drafted in consultation with authorities on
European and constitutional law by Anthony Coughlan, Secretary of the
National Platform EU Research and Information Centre, 24 Crawford Avenue,
Dublin 9, Ireland; Tel.: 00-353-1-8305792; E-mail:
nationalplatformeuric@xxxxxxxxxx
It may be disseminated or adapted in whole or in part by whoever wishes to
do that, without any need of reference to or acknowledgement of its
source.
One of gordon's red lines obviously protect MP pensions.
Arthur
.
- References:
- What the EU Constitution says
- From: DVH
- What the EU Constitution says
- Prev by Date: Re: Friggin' unbelievable!!! Judge overturns verdict....
- Next by Date: Re: ♫ Islam is genocide ♫
- Previous by thread: What the EU Constitution says
- Next by thread: Re: What the EU Constitution says
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
