Re: yet another fossil fuel disaster 22....filth pumped into atmosphere

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:09:45 -0400, FACE <AFaceInTheCrowd@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:50:15 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, for Re: yet another
fossil fuel disaster 22....filth pumped into atmosphere, abelard
<abelard3@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote

However, I wasn't raising it in the face of destruction delivered by the fossil
fuel industry.

i know what you were doing...it is a common way of distracting from
the subject matter...

Now I was going to be nice and not point out your subtle subject

the subject was filthy fossil fuel disasters.....
not the one high anomalous nuclear foul up....

transmogrification to your advantage..........

However, I can go into it if you like................

It has the scent of the red herring fallacy but tends to a strawman trying to
get me to tilt at windmills....... Didn't work, seldom does unless I want to
play along for other reasons...........

but you are tilting at windmills made of straw....ie chernobyl......

When posts are driven by emotion, usenet can be a silly place.......
That is *not* to say that all emotional posts are silly......

that looks suspiciously like another straw windmills.....

why raise chernobyl....it's irrelevant....
why not raise abefan....it killed more than chernobyl...and
those immediately....not after 20 or 30 years more life....
and it is on the subject.....

http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/politics/aberfan/desc.htm

think of the children!

regards

--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

Quantcast