Re: If they lied about the German 'camp gassings'...for soooo long....



Whatever the case there is no way that the facts of the gulags can, in
any way, mitigates the Auschwitz complex, Kracow, Travlinka or even
Dachau. All are equally unacceptable instances of uncivilised human
behaviour.

Of course. As was the postwar American response:-

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:czF7iWGezw0J:www.stormfront.org/solargeneral/library/www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/VanRoden1948.html+dachau+trials&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=uk

American Atrocities in Germany

By JUDGE EDWARD L VAN RODEN



AMERICAN investigators at the U. S. Court in Dachau, Germany, used the
following methods to obtain confessions: Beatings and brutal kickings.
Knocking out teeth and breaking jaws. Mock trials. Solitary
confinement. Posturing as priests. Very limited rations. Spiritual
deprivation. Promises of acquittal. Complaints concerning these third
degree methods were received by Secretary of the Army Kenneth Royall
last Spring [1948]. Royall appointed Justice Gordon Simpson of the
Texas Supreme Court and me to go to Germany and check up on the
reports. Accompanied by Lt. Col. Charles Lawrence, Jr., we went to
Munich, Germany, set up offices there, and heard a stream of testimony
about the way in which American atrocities were committed.

But first, a bit of the background. Last Spring the Supreme Court
refused the habeas corpus petition of Col. Willis N. Everett, Jr., an
American lawyer, who had served as defense counsel for the 74 Germans
accused in the famous Malmedy case. Everett is a very able lawyer, a
conscientious and sincere gentleman. He is not a fanatic.

In his petition, Everett charged that the Germans had not received a
fair trial. Everett did not claim that all the German defendants were
innocent, but since they did not have a fair trial, there was no way
of telling the innocent from the guilty.

The tragedy is that so many of us Americans, having fought and won the
war with so much sweat and blood, now say, "All Germans should be
punished." We won the war, but some of us want to go on killing. That
seems to me wicked.

If Everett's shocking charges were true, they would be a blot on the
American conscience for eternity. The fact that there were atrocities
by the Germans during the war against Americans, or by Americans
against Germans, would not in the least lessen our disgrace if such
peacetime atrocities were to go unchallenged.

Our specific assignment was not only to examine Col. Everett's
charges, but also to examine the cases of the 139 death sentences,
which at that time remained unexecuted: 152 Germans had already been
executed.

The 139 doomed men who were still alive fell into three groups. They
were accused of involvement in the Dachau concentration camp crimes,
in the killing of American fliers, or in the Malmedy massacres. Let me
say that I believe the crimes for which these Germans were tried
actually took place, and that some Germans were guilty of them.

But we should not let the indiscriminate hate of all Germans that was
generated during and after the war, blind us to the necessity of
punishing the guilty ones only.

HimmleronTimeAfter this investigation, and after talking to all sides,
I do not believe that the German people knew what the German
Government was doing. I am convinced the German populace had no idea
what diabolical crimes that arch-fiend, [Heinrich] Himmler, was
committing in the concentration camps. From the atrocities we learned
about, he must have been the very prince of devils.

But as for the Germans at large, they fought the war as loyal citizens
with a fatherland to support, and a fatherland to defend.

Some American fliers, shot down on bombing raids over Germany, were
killed by German civilians.

These Germans felt that the American fliers were the murderers of
their defenseless wives, mothers, and children who were in the bombed
cities, just as the English felt that German fliers were their
murderers. That's war.

I felt deeply about these fliers. I had two sons in the Air Force.
Jimmy made 35 missions over Germany and returned safe, thank God! ***
made 32 Missions and was finally shot down over Italy. He spent 12
months in a German prisoner-of-war camp and was fairly well treated.
He is now in a sanitarium in Arizona recovering from TB he contracted
in the camp.
II

The Malmedy massacres, in which a group of American prisoners of war
were mown down after being captured during the Battle of the Bulge,
actually happened. But can't we distinguish between the assertion that
these atrocities did happen, and the assertion that they were
committed by these 74 Germans who had been in or near Malmedy at that
time?

Because some wicked sadistic German individuals did it, are we doing
the right thing by saying any and all Germans we lay our hands on are
guilty and should be destroyed? I personally don't believe that.
That's not the way of thinking I learnt in my church, or you learned
in your church.

On Russian insistence, the Americans couldn't retry these men. The
Russian philosophy in these matters is that the investigators
determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, and the judge merely
sets the sentence. We accepted the Russian formula of no-retrial, but
we won out on the presumption of innocence before trial.

The American prohibition of hear-say evidence had been suspended.
Second and third-hand testimony was admitted, although the Judge
Advocate General warned against the value of hearsay evidence,
especially when it was obtained, as this was, two or three years after
the act. Lt. Col. Ellis and Lt Perl of the Prosecution pleaded that it
was difficult to obtain competent evidence. Perl told the court, "We
had a tough case to crack and we had to use persuasive methods." He
admitted to the court that the persuasive methods included various
"expedients, including some violence and mock trials." He further told
the court that the cases rested on statements obtained by such
methods.

The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men
who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four, and,
five months. They were confined between four walls, with no windows,
and no opportunity of exercise. Two meals a day were shoved in to them
through a slot in the door. They were not allowed to talk to anyone.
They had no communication with their families or any minister or
priest during that time.

This solitary confinement proved sufficient in itself in some cases to
persuade the Germans to sign prepared statements. These statements not
only involved the signer, but often would involve other defendants
III

Our investigators would put a black hood over the accused's head and
then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him, and beat him
with rubber hose. Many of the German defendants had teeth knocked out.
Some had their jaws broken.

All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had
been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard
Operating Procedure with American investigators.

Perl admitted use of mock trials and persuasive methods including
violence and said the court was free to decide the weight to be
attached to evidence thus received. But it all went in.

One 18 year old defendant, after a series of beatings, was writing a
statement being dictated to him. When they reached the 16th page, the
boy was locked up for the night. In the early morning, Germans in
nearby cells heard him muttering. "I will not utter another lie." When
the jailer came in later to get him to finish his false statement, he
found the German hanging from a cell bar, dead. However the statement
that the German had hanged himself to escape signing was offered and
received in evidence in the trial of the others.

Sometimes a prisoner who refused to sign was led into a dimly lit
room, where a group of civilian investigators, wearing U. S. Army
uniforms. were seated around a black table with a crucifix in the
center and two candles burning, one on each aide. "You will now have
your American trial," the defendant was told.

The sham court passed a sham sentence of death. Then the accused was
told, "You will hang in a few days, as soon as the general approves
this sentence: but in the meantime sign this confession and we can get
you acquitted." Some still wouldn't sign.

We were shocked by the crucifix being used so mockingly.

In another case, a bogus Catholic priest (actually an investigator)
entered the cell of one of the defendants, heard his confession, gave
him absolution, and then gave him a little friendly tip: "Sign
whatever the investigators ask you to sign. It will get you your
freedom. Even though it's false, I can give you absolution now in
advance for the lie you'd tell."

Our final report on these trials has been turned over to Secretary of
the Army Royall. In spite of the many instances like those I have
described. we found no general conspiracy to obtain evidence
improperly. With the exception of 29 cases, we saw no reason why the
executions should not be carried out. For the 110 others, there was
sufficient competent evidence from other sources to warrant the death
penalty, exclusive of the evidence obtained by the third-degree.

The 29 men whose sentences we recommended for commutation certainly
did not have a fair trial by American standards. Twenty-seven of them
were to have their terms reduced to life, one of them was to get 10
years, and one would get two and one-half years, according to our
recommendations. We also recommended a permanent program of clemency
for reconsideration of the sentences of other prisoners convicted in
war crimes cases.

Secretary Royall has saved our national conscience. Could we as
Americans ever have held our heads up if he hadn't looked into it? He
has saved our national prestige and our international reputation.

However, in spite of Secretary Royall's action in this matter, there
is little real room for complacency on the part of Americans. Rather
our report reveals, by implication, that we still have a serious
situation in Germany to clear up. Moreover, five of the men for whom
we recommended commutations have been hanged since we turned in our
report. In all 100 of the 139 we set out to investigate are now dead.
IV

The American investigators who committed the atrocities in the name of
American Justice and under the American flag are going scot-free. At
this point there are two objectives which should be aimed for:

* 1. Those prisoners whose death sentences have not been commuted
and who have not yet been hanged should be saved, pending full
judicial review.
* 2. American investigators who abused the powers of victory and
prostituted justice to vengeance, should be exposed in a public
process, preferably in the U. S., and prosecuted.

Unless these crimes committed by Americans are exposed by us at home,
the prestige of America and American justice will suffer permanent and
irreparable damage. We can partially atone for our own misconduct if
we first search It out and publicly condemn and disavow it. If we wait
for our enemies to blazon our guilt abroad, we can only bow our heads
in shamed admission.





EDWARD L. VAN RODEN, a Pennsylvania judge served in World War I
and II, in the latter as Chief of the Military Justice Division for
the European Theater where he saw service in Normandy, Belgium, the
Rhineland, the Battle of the Bulge, and in the Ardennes. In 1946 he
was reassigned to active duty and served on several important court
martial trials in Germany. In 1948 Secretary of the Army Royall
appointed him to an extraordinary commission charged with
investigating the Dachau War Crimes program.


.

Quantcast