Re: Why Brussels Mayor banned the protest against the Islamization of Europe
- From: Jason P <Jaspetr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:51:16 -0700
On Aug 12, 6:30 pm, "simple_langu...@xxxxxxxxx"
<simple_langu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
source:http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/
Here's a list of the ruling Socialist Party (PS) members of the
Brussels city council headed by Mayor Freddy Thielemans.
Of the eighteen PS members, no fewer than ten have obvious Muslim
names. It's possible others may be 'reverts'.
Thielemans is just a buffoonish front man. Muslims now control the key
city at the heart of the European Union.
1. Fatima Abid
2. Mustafa Amrani
3. Samira Attalbi
4. Mohammed Boukantar
5. Philippe Close
6. Jean Baptiste de Crée
7. Ahmed el Ktibi
8. Julie Fiszman
9. Faouzia Hariche
10. Karine Lalieux
11. Marie-Paule Mathias
12. Yvan Mayeur
13. Mounia Mejbar
14. Mohamed Ouria Ghli
15. Mahfoudh Romdhani
16. Sevket Temiz
17. Freddy Thielemans
18. Christian Van Der Linden
- - - - - - - - -
(Compiled from info at Stop the Islamisation of Denmark)
So Muslims already have a clear majority in the ruling party of the
Brussels city council.
It's become obvious over the last few days that the permit-application
process administered by the Mayor's office in Brussels was little more
than a charade. Now it's clear why that was.
SIOE never had a chance for a permit. They might just as well have not
bothered.
I'm of two minds on this. On one hand I believe there is very little
difference between races on a genetic level and consequently on a
practical cellular-mechanics level. Yet on another scale I feel,
almost intuitively, that genetic differences occur, but I see these as
a function of culture and nurturing, not genetics or pathological
capability.
I think "Stats" is a wonderful tool to study many things, but I see
situations where much of the data is mis-applied in ways that make the
apparent results seem, at best, very dubious. Yes indeed, one standard
deviation is significant, per Chebychev's theorems and all that, but I
wonder if the data isn't skewed and the results offer a mathematical
profile of an entirely different "data-set," though the parameters
were drawn-up around supposed "genetic" markers.
In short, I think genetic --mathematical-- parameters are inherently
culturally related, and data that is called "genetic" is really a
function of racial-ethnic culture.
To be more explicit about my view, I believe that the problems with
many "genetic" sub-groups are really cultural issues as a result of
underlying nurturing problems. For example, I think many Islamic
cultures are devoid of a larger more enlightened world view. I also
think the same is true of the most prominent Jewish cultures,
especially the ones stemming from Eastern Europe now found in the
U.S., Israel, and Northern-Central Europe.
Metaphorically: Sometimes comparing apples to oranges show results
based not on color and smell, as much as taste and texture of the
same. Lots of things go into "genetics," some tangible, some not-so-
tangible.
To draw proper conclusions one much be required to use the right data-
set. And always, statistics is about probability, not absolutes.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Why Brussels Mayor banned the protest against the Islamization of Europe
- From: simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
- Why Brussels Mayor banned the protest against the Islamization of Europe
- Prev by Date: Re: Sharon's house hit by rocket
- Next by Date: Re: the clown's meddling contrasted with tory freedom.....
- Previous by thread: Why Brussels Mayor banned the protest against the Islamization of Europe
- Next by thread: Re: Why Brussels Mayor banned the protest against the Islamization of Europe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
