Re: imbalanced reporting
- From: Ariadne <ariadne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:44:55 -0700
On 31 Jul, 17:35, "TD" <tdefr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The BBC on longer detention:
"As the debate rages over the length of time terror suspects can be detained
without charge, three people whose lives were changed forever in 2005 by the
7 July London bombings explain why they are backing an extension."
"Prime Minister Gordon Brown wants to double the current limit to 56 days,
but on Monday a parliamentary committee said there was not enough evidence
to justify it. "
"Here, bomb survivor Michael Henning, and Rob Webb and June Taylor, both
relatives of victims, say why they think the parliamentary committee is
wrong. "
Where is the comment from survivors and relatives of victims who think the
parliamentary committee is right?
Where is your evidence that any do think it's right?
Not that I think the BBC is unbiased.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: imbalanced reporting
- From: TD
- Re: imbalanced reporting
- References:
- imbalanced reporting
- From: TD
- imbalanced reporting
- Prev by Date: imbalanced reporting
- Next by Date: Spicing up British politics!
- Previous by thread: imbalanced reporting
- Next by thread: Re: imbalanced reporting
- Index(es):