High commissioner Blair -- ...the envoy should be knowledgeable about affairs in the region and closely in touch with its people, their interests, sentiments and aspirations.

High commissioner Blair
Galal Nassar
Al-Ahram Weekly
Jul 12, 2007


That President George W Bush nominated former UK prime minister Tony
Blair to serve as the Quartet's envoy to the Middle East says a great
deal about the underpinnings of US policy in the region. The Quartet
quickly accepted the nomination, assigning Blair an office in
Jerusalem, just as the representative of His Majesty's government used
to have an office in Jerusalem during the British mandate in
Palestine. That, as everyone knows, ended in the 1948 war and the
creation of Israel.

One might have hoped that the Quartet would have searched high and low
for a representative who could play a pivotal role in reactivating
peace exchanges between the Palestinians and the Israelis, as well as
between Israel and the Arabs. What, one wonders, are Blair's
qualifications for such a job?

If the Quartet wants to see justice prevail in the region it needs an
envoy who can be fair, unprejudiced and unbiased. Does Blair fit such
a job description? Let's see what Blair said in 1998, on the 50th
anniversary of the creation of the Jewish entity. Blair then delivered
a speech in which he lashed out at Labour leaders who criticised
Israel, saying they made him feel ashamed, as he put it, of being a
"friend of Israel". Blair promised to change this state of affairs so
that Israel's friends in the Labour Party could declare their
friendship publicly and forcefully.

Blair fulfilled his promise. Indeed, he exceeded it. Not only did he
let Israel's friends within the Labour Party speak out without
embarrassment, he turned such friendship into a prerequisite for
advancing within the ranks of the Labour Party and the government.
Blair made a point of harassing those Labour leaders who dared to take
a fair-minded stand on the Arab-Israeli conflict, including former
foreign secretary Robin Cook. Blair acted against Labour members who
publicly supported the Arabs, first expelling them from the party and
then trying to drive them out of public life.

He appointed his friend, Lord Levy, a zealous Zionist, as his personal
envoy to the region. Levy, who had Blair's full backing, took Israel's
side in a crude manner. When Levy said he would leave his position
once Blair left his post, many of those who want Britain to maintain
its credibility in the Middle East and the Arab region heaved a sigh
of relief. Richard Spring, foreign affairs spokesman for the
Conservative Party, said Levy's conduct had been an embarrassment,
adding that the UK government, if it wanted to restore its credibility
among the Arabs, should avoid making the same mistake Blair made when
he appointed Levy as his envoy.

Blair has sided with Israel in all aspects of its conflict with the
Arabs, over the Palestinians, Syria and Lebanon. During Israel's
summer assault against Lebanon Blair, like George Bush, opposed an
early ceasefire, hoping that Israel would succeed in destroying
Hizbullah. Blair didn't change his position until Israel and the US
administration changed theirs.

In the wake of such policies it became common in British Zionist
circles to speak of Blair as an "international Zionist leader".
Indeed, when Blair left office, the Israelis, led by Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert, gave him a standing ovation, expressing gratitude for the
help he, as Israel's friend, had provided throughout his term in
office.

The Quartet's envoy should be knowledgeable about affairs in the
region and closely in touch with its people, their interests,
sentiments and aspirations. He should have sufficient experience and
knowledge to propose appropriate steps and policies. This is a basic
qualification for anyone who wants to be involved in regional matters,
irrespective of their aims. Such knowledge and experience is as
necessary for someone who seeks to promote the interests of the region
as it is for those who seek to exploit it.

Does Blair possess such qualifications? As a confirmed friend of the
Israelis he may have knowledge of Israel but that doesn't make him an
expert on the region. It doesn't qualify him to speak about the
region's people, culture and preferences.

The most damning proof of Blair's lack of knowledge of the region and
most of its people is the fact that he was one of the key supporters
of the invasion of Iraq. Outspoken in his support of the war, he
helped in its planning and execution. The US and the UK have paid a
heavy price for this absurd war, and are not done paying yet. Should
the occupation end and nationalists, Islamists or pro-Iranian groups
emerge at the helm, things may not turn out as the US and the UK had
hoped. All of these groups pose a greater threat to the US and the UK
than the deposed government of Iraq.

Any one who placed the future of Iraq, and by extension the whole
region, in harm's way cannot be an expert in regional affairs. Such a
person should not assume a task that impacts on the region's future.
He can only harm the interests of the countries of the West,
imperilling their security and stability. Decision-makers in
Washington, London or Brussels did not need exceptional insight to
know that Blair's Middle East policy had made him unqualified to make
plans for the region. Throughout his term in office Blair has taken
consistently hostile position towards the Arabs. It had been hoped
that Blair's policies would end when he left 10 Downing Street. His
appointment as representative of the Quartet dashed such hopes. Now
the former prime minister will be able to pursue his old aims through
new means. George Bush wanted to reward Blair for his hostility to the
Arabs, and also to humiliate and hurt the Arabs through his nomination
of the former UK prime minister. In backing Bush's nominee the Quartet
has endorsed a disastrous choice.

--- --- --- --- ---
©2006-2007 Institute for Middle East Understanding -- This article was
originally published by Al-Ahram Weekly

.

Relevant Pages

  • Bush, Blair and other allies of Israel do not want a ceasefire despite their claims
    ... Blair and other allies of Israel do not want a ceasefire despite their ... The truth of Blair's 'urgent diplomacy' ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • Re: nbc West vs. Islam nbc
    ... And our values as extolled by Blair and Bush are examples to live by? ... It's the West (and Israel) vs. Reactionary Islam, ... war and tyranny" and that the latter had descended in the ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: nbc West vs. Islam nbc
    ... Tony Blair nails it. ... It's the West (and Israel) vs. Reactionary Islam, ... war and tyranny" and that the latter had descended in the ... Iraq that caused terrorism, ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Tony Blair and the business of covering up war crimes
    ... Tony Blair gave a lecture at a New York university. ... Israel, and he received heartfelt farewells-and-hellos from Ehud ... On 27 December 2008, Israel launched the Gaza massacre, which it ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
  • Blair warns of arc of extremism across Middle East
    ... "arc of extremism" across the Middle East and the world would rue the ... the Lebanon is if we deal with the underlying causes that are giving ... rise to that," Blair told BBC television in an interview from Saint ... Israel and Palestine when you can get back into negotiating a two-state ...
    (soc.culture.china)
Loading