Re: kaletsky points to the real selection problem in schools....
- From: Joe <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:47:24 +0100
abelard wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 07:43:10 GMT, "pencil"
<pencil.erasor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The 'inconsistency' arises only if you confuse socialism with a beliefBut kaletsky's a liberal himself...
even a socialist...
however, it is a strange element of reality, that even a socialist
can get things right if those things do not entirely clash with
their religion...
though the fact that he can possibly consider the disruptives
as unequal, can amaze and confound a consistent mind....
in equality. Socialism requires inequality for its existence. How would
you go about robbing Peter to pay Paul without the help of Mary, who
determines who is Peter and who is Paul? All three very unequal groups
are necessary.
True egalitarians are usually called 'libertarians' (once 'liberals',
before politicians hijacked the name) and are universally despised.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Crooked police adding 1000's innocent children to DNA database
- Next by Date: Re: Opting out of HRA
- Previous by thread: Re: kaletsky points to the real selection problem in schools....
- Next by thread: Re: kaletsky points to the real selection problem in schools....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading