Global Warning is a Giant Brain Fart sold to us by Scammers. -- Nanotechnology can Save this Planet and Make it Work
- From: "Jason P." <jaspetr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 19:30:57 -0700
Nanotechnology can Save this Planet and Make it Work
Contributed by: hjbald
e-mail:
----- Original Message -----
From: Karl W B Schwarz
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:23 AM
Subject: Nanotechnology can Save this Planet and Make it Work
Greetings to all Email Update Members,
Not a day goes by that someone around the globe does not send me the
latest nanotechnology announcement from MIT, or an article on the
subject posted on the Jeff Rense website or technology news websites.
The latest one was hilarious to us because it addressed nanopolymers
made of gold and we have been doing nanopolymers made of petrochemical
derivatives for over 4 years. Polymers are petrochemical derivatives,
not metal derivatives. It made us wonder what they thought they
discovered at MIT and we are quite sure their gold nanopolymers cannot
compete with what we are doing.
Within days the "gold touts" were out on the Internet that
"nanotechnology will push the price of gold past $2,000 an ounce. BUY
NOW!" Please do not fall for that.
There is much misinformation about the science and hopefully this
email will clear some of that up.
One of the things I have noticed about Americans is they have
developed a bad habit of opinions based on no facts and
hyperventilation on the essence of nothingness. For example, the
recent "WW III Starts on Good Friday, April 6, 2007, END OF THE
WORLD". Well, it didn't and it didn't. Maybe you got nuked where you
are but where I am the world is doing just fine. Come to grips with
that for it was false information and the product of a brain fart
someone had that had no basis in reality.
All of this hype and agenda driven spin about global warming, while
baseball games are being snowed out in Cleveland 4 days in a row in
April and both Alaska and Canada are having record cold winters is
"not in tune with current realities and facts" if you stop and think
it through. Here we are in April and as far south as my home of
Alpharetta, GA it is just downright cold. People at this year's
Masters were wearing jackets, knit caps, wool scarves, etc to stay
warm. That is a first for that tournament. The sales of hot coffee
were brisk.
I remember several years ago Al Gore was in the Northeast (Boston as I
recall) doing his global warming scam tour while temperatures in
Vermont were minus 100 F in places and it was brutally cold in
Massachusetts. That is dangerously cold whether you do it in
Fahrenheit or Celsius.
The Sun is going through powerful shifts over the last several years
and it is affecting weather all the way out to Pluto. That is a
scientific fact and people need to pay attention to all facts before
they hyperventilate and knee-jerk in the wrong directions based on
wrong facts or no facts or flat out erroneous information. No, the
Gore Oscar does not obviate the scientific facts.
Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune all have increased storms and polar auras
that are only possible with increased and very powerful solar forces.
Jupiter does not have just one Red Spot massive hurricane, it now has
two and others forming. These are hurricane like storms about half the
size of North America and there is not any place to hide to get out of
the way of its fury. Some of the smaller storms that are forming on
Jupiter are like Super Cell tornados. Imagine a tornado the size of
say Connecticut or Oklahoma.
The polar ice caps of Mars have decreased due to this same solar
activity, so if Al Gore can explain why our use of hydrocarbons on
Earth is altering the weather on Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, all
the way out to Pluto, I will kiss his ass and given him a second Oscar
for "Best Fiction Documentary". If you do not believe me, go to the
Hubble website and study the photos relating to our neighborhood, the
Solar System. http://hubblesite.org/gallery/album/solar_system_collection/
Some idiot came up with the theory that the solar powered Mars Rover
was to blame for the decrease in the polar ice caps on Mars. That
person needs to get back on the meds and back to bed or back in their
rubber room.
Another fallacy of the Gore hype is CO2 is not a pollutant, it is food
for plants. Plants absorb CO2, break it down so they can grow and live
and release free oxygen so you can breathe and live. The PPM [parts
per million] of CO2 in the atmosphere is not anywhere close to
creating a Green House effect on Earth. The scientists who have done
the research and are not tied to this new agenda have been silenced or
ignored.
It is not politically correct to challenge this new global warming
boogeyman with real science, real facts, or real data.
The bigger problem is pollution of other forms that is undermining the
health of humans and all forms of mammals and fish species. They do
not want you to pay attention to that because that means big
corporations might be held accountable for their not being good
stewards and good corporate neighbors. They do not want you to know
that willful negligence is killing much of this planet and global
warming is nothing to fear if you are dead.
I know I do not have to undergo that indignity of kissing Al Gore's
fat ass because I know Al Gore is nothing but an agenda and a
mouthpiece for same. It is all about lining just the right pockets
with your money and mine. He did not invent the Internet and he is not
an authority on global warming or the reasons for it. Gore does not
want to have a discussion with anyone that the polar ice caps on Mars
are shrinking too for that would be news that does not fit the agenda
here on Earth.
We cannot have scientific facts interrupting the latest scam or latest
photo op.
Some of you may recall the Gore - Richard Branson hype recently where
Branson and Virgin are going to award $25,000,000 to the person who
figures out how to save the entire planet Earth from nothing. If you
dig deep the agenda is clear to see. Gore and Branson are after DOE
[Department of Energy] grants to build ethanol plants in the US and we
can presume through the IMF, World Bank, OPIC and other behind the
scenes financing sources other plants around the world. Just check
into Virgin Energy and the agenda should become clear to you.
http://www.virgin.com/subsites/virginfuels/Portfolio.asp
Note California and the State of Tennessee at that website link. Can I
track a rat or can I track a rat? Al Gore is from Tennessee, remember?
Ethanol is only useful if one presumes that the only way to power a
car is with petroleum and petroleum additives. It is not.
Nanotechnology makes possible a complete departure from powering cars
that way and we are right in the middle of that sector too.
I have had high level meetings with petroleum companies over the past
10 months and some of them finally "get it". The remaining reserves of
petroleum are worth far more in nanotechnology than squandering it on
automobiles and hopping from mall to mall to shop until you drop.
The same type of disinformation is happening with nanotechnology and
there are reasons for that.
First, nanotechnology is a scientific, intellectual property driven
sector and the United States is lagging way behind the EU, Japan and
the People's Republic of China in what is the next big thing to come
along. Most of the recent graduating classes with PhDs from major
universities in the US in chemistry, physics and nanotechnology have
been students from the PRC and they are returning home to kick our ass
in this key future technology. Many of them are from India too and
they too are returning home to build a new type of economy that is not
subject to nor subjugated by US policy and desires to control all
things on this planet through energy and financial terrorism.
Part of the "problem with Iran" is they will be selling oil, natural
gas and enriched uranium to India and the People's Republic of China,
which basically means that the attempts of the US, UK and Australia to
control those economies is about to be history. Far too few people
"get it" that the US, UK, Australia and Canada to some extent want to
control uranium for money and economic reasons, not WMD reasons.
Some people question why I am putting our carbon nanotechnology plant
in Europe. Simple answer, because the EU is light years ahead of the
US in nanotechnology and we have more scientists at our fingertips
than any of our competitors. Every time we met with a US university
departments started arguing over who was going to get credit and who
was going after and manage the state and federal grant money.
It is sort of an institutionalized arrogance within our government and
corporate America that they are smarter than everyone else and somehow
think they have the patent on brains, art, music, science, physics,
chemistry, nanotechnology, etc. Far from it and that is going to come
home to roost in real and harsh ways over the coming years.
We built our company and a vast stable of scientific breakthroughs
without a single state or federal grant and without the aid of
universities that are now just glorified bureaucracies clamoring for
money for research that never seems to get anything done. It is not
about the science and the betterment of mankind. It is now all about
the money.
This new market sector of nanotechnology is far bigger than computers
and IT and the Internet combined because nanotechnology will touch and
improve thousands of products, and create new applications and
products that have never existed before and are not possible without
the advent of nanotechnology. It will create entire new industries and
revolutionize current major industries like aerospace and automotive,
computers, medicine, pharmacology, etc.
In the future you will probably drive a car made of nanotech enhanced
carbon composites that is far stronger than the metal and plastics
being used today. Better yet, it will run on hydrogen and emit no
pollution.
It is important to note and grasp that mankind did not invent
nanotechnology, God did. All nanotechnology is and what the word means
is the manipulation of matter at under 100 nanometers. God has always
excelled at that and we have not until recently and for the most part
we still do not excel at it as a species. We have far too many people
stuck on stupid and hyperventilate over nothing or worse, anything
they hear whether fact or fiction.
The average human hair is about 80,000 nanometers thick so consider
how small 100 nanometers is. A nanometer is one-billionth of a meter,
so imagine a yard stick (meter long) divided into one billion tiny
segments. It gives a whole new meaning to "accurate measurement". The
average human virus is about 300 nm so what we make is in many
instances metric tons of something smaller than a human virus yet
incredibly strong and have remarkable properties.
Forest fires produce low grade buckyballs (Fullerenes they are called
after Buckminster Fuller) and carbon nanotubes. Now, if forest fires
are harmful to you other than maybe burning down your home, you have
reason to hyperventilate. Otherwise, accept that nanotubes have been
around as long as there has been heat and carbon on this planet. The
trick is in making them highly pure and with high crystalline
structure integrity (what the scientists call morphology). That is
what my company excels in. We are the world leader in those two
departments, purity and morphology and soon, sheer volume.
If you are going to freak out regarding forest fires, stop using your
fireplace at home because you are spewing carbon nanotubes out into
the environment and into your home. And for God's sake stop enjoying a
camp fire when you go hunting or camping because you are spreading
nanotubes all over the pristine forests.
They have tested the pigments of the great masters Leonardo da Vinci
and Michelangelo and found nanotubes in the dark pigments, those made
from heat and carbon. So if you think they were involved in some
sinister plot to end mankind with their art, hyperventilate all you
wish or get a grip on reality.
Every diesel engine ever made produces low purity buckyballs and
nanotubes. So if that makes you have an aversion to public
transportation, heavy earth moving equipment and farm tractors,
hyperventilate all you wish. If you cannot start your tractor or
tiller again to plant a garden due to such fears, better tone up and
learn to use a pick and shovel. If Al Gore gets his way you can call
him for used goats to mow your yard and used jackasses to plow that
garden. He knows a bunch of them up in Washington, DC, that being used
goats and used jackasses.
Second, the firms that are paying for these "Boo Reports" behind the
scenes are for the most part the same ones trying to dominate
nanotechnology worldwide and such reports discourage bankers,
investors and others from moving when the time is ripe to move. It is
that delay that they wish to create so they can catch up after years
of sitting on their over-inflated laurels thinking they were master's
of the universe and intellectual property would rule the world.
Third, particle size does matter but for every negative regarding
nanotechnology our scientists and I can cite hundreds to thousands of
reasons to do it. If you take a small enough particle of something as
benign as cotton, insert it into a lab rat or mouse, you can create a
malignant tumor. Now, are we going to hyperventilate about a cotton
boogeyman or use nanotechnology to defeat cancer and other plagues
affecting mankind?
I have been exposed to carbon nanotubes all of my life and cannot see
any ill effects from it whatsoever. You have been exposed to them too
but just did not know it. The rascals are very small and hard to see.
Remember, carbon nanotubes have been around since there has been
carbon based plants on this planet and fire, so, are you feeling any
ill effect from those trees and flowers?
There have been nano-scale particles of every known element since the
creation of the Universe. Get over it.
We are working right now on 7 different ways to treat cancer using
nanotechnology including biotechnology, pharmacology, and even new
types of surgical procedures that could kill the tumor without opening
up the human body. If you have ever been treated with chemotherapy,
where they poison the entire body to kill a small tumor, the future
prospects are that nanotechnology will produce means of treating
cancer somewhat as intrusive as taking a pill or getting a shot. The
nanotechnology will attack just the malignant tumor, not every cell in
your body. Consider that benefits might outweigh all of the
hyperventilation by people not qualified to even comment on it. Many
of these "boo artists" are not scientists, not physicists, not
chemists and frankly do not have a clue what they are talking about.
We hear all the hype about the burning of fossil fuels to generate
energy and power our cars. Are we going to stop the drive towards a
future where nanotechnology will power the homes and cars and leave no
pollution or do we stop the science because ill informed, uneducated
and uninformed people are hyperventilating about something they know
nothing about?
I know from firsthand experience over the past 7 years that most PhD
scientists are not experts in nanotechnology, so ask why these non-
degreed folks are howling at the moon about something they know
nothing about. Many of the people doing all of the fear mongering have
never been in a lab, especially one equipped to explore
nanotechnology.
I remember when we made the breakthrough to produce at >95% to >99.5%
purity (trust me, that horrifies our competition) and I wanted to know
why 100% was not possible. Somewhat akin to asking a quantum mechanics
expert what time it was and they take you through the process of
explaining the physics and nature of a watch (and theory of time
itself), I had to endure a 4 hour dissertation on a wet board as to
why nothing in the universe is 100% pure except a single atom and
sometimes not even that.
It was pure rocket science but it made me appreciate the scientific
adage of "garbage in, garbage out" and how that relates to what we do.
Instead of wringing our hands on what to do, we teamed up with the
people that supply our feed stocks and showed them how to use our
science to make even higher purity possible.
That was so we could have the purity to go around the "garbage in,
garbage out" problem many of our competitors are still struggling with
at this time.
Every now and then I get a link like this one that causes us to smile
and sometimes laugh out loud. This one was a hoot. http://www.liftport.com/
They are building a 15,000 square feet nanotube production facility.
Very soon we are breaking ground on a carbon nanotube facility that is
close to 1 million square feet with output measured in tens of
thousands of metric tons. As we have been designing this state-of-the-
art facility another opportunity has been put on the table for us to
build a facility 5 to 10 times as large per month as our first plant
can produce in a year. That facility might wind up being in the range
of 7 to 10 million square feet of production capacity and measured in
metric tons per day in output.
The future has arrived and so have we.
-- -- -- -- -- --
Copyright © 2007 Vive le Canada
.
- Prev by Date: Al Gore In TriBeCa "An Inconvenient Truth" showed glaciers in Antarctica melting and falling into the sea. That's the normal process of creating other glaciers. The film didn't mention that the Hubbard Glacier in Alaska's Tongass National Forest is advancing so rapidly, it threatens to close off a major inlet.
- Next by Date: Re: FAO Chris.... and all other concerned Nationalists...Unison Election interference...
- Previous by thread: Al Gore In TriBeCa "An Inconvenient Truth" showed glaciers in Antarctica melting and falling into the sea. That's the normal process of creating other glaciers. The film didn't mention that the Hubbard Glacier in Alaska's Tongass National Forest is advancing so rapidly, it threatens to close off a major inlet.
- Next by thread: Re: times online on bnp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
