Re: Israeli army shoots at ITV camera crew

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:04:09 +0100, fred_eg_bowinatuck wrote:

"FriarTuck" <all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.27.09.16.33.788735@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I asked the question of you, "name one substance that is poison to a
rat but safe for a human", you then wandered off into definitions of
"safe" and "poison" in absence of any real answer to my question.

You then posit that nothing is "safe" for humans, well don't starve or
die of thirst in your paranoia will you... :) remember, according to
you,
water is poison....

As I said before, you can ask any question you like,
I am under no obligation to answer it.


Well thats not really playing fair in a discussion is it

Nor is asking 'do I still beat my wife'.

Do I detect a guilty conscience....

I never asked you such a thing, makes me wonder why you mention it???

If I disagree with the premise of the question,
I am entitled not to answer.


Well I rephrased the question to address your issues about definition
of the term "safe" and you still didn't answer


As the question was as you put it,
an (obscure) subdivision of my statement,
based on loose or ill defined language (safe for humans) it had little
merit.

Again you seem to revert to your nonsense statements which bear no
relation to what I actually said.


Rest not read.

Well its somewhat off topic anyway, as you not surprisingly for a
political worm like yourself avoided the very pertinent question I asked
on the topic of this thread by starting to waffle about some old argument
you lost ages ago, you still have not told me what you think the TLA ITN
stands for....

Fact is, it stands for

ITN (Independent Television News)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITN

And what does ITV stand for....

ITV (Independent Television)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITV

Therefore referring to them as ITV News is perfectly grammatically correct.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Consistent Moral Standards
    ... Life has been peaceful, and humans have been safe, in significant ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Nuclear Power - the only answer.
    ... It would be really great if nuclear power were safe. ... Potentially it could be but it never will be because humans are unfortunately involved in the equation. ... It would be really great if people did not try to play power games with the by products of nuclear power generation but sadly they do and because they do it will never really be safe or seen as safe which amounts to the same thing in the end. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: OT Spread the Stupidity!
    ... safe for Humans to drink as it comes from the same tank as tap water- ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: OT Spread the Stupidity!
    ... But I do wonder if it could be considered safe drinking water for cats? ... it is safe for humans. ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: Consistent Moral Standards
    ... Wasn't it Lenny Bruce who originally said "Killing for peace is like ... A world where life is peaceful and humans are safe is ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)