Re: Firemen forced to attend 'Museum of Tolerance'


"Chris X" <chris_x2006@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:w6OdnTV3_oirtmrZRVnyiw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Damot" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:n7aef2tj142jbjjnbjrgcfo1nhksfvbh9h@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:17:01 +0100, "Chris.S" <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Damot" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9l9ef2532he4q7k7ht8v3h23jm7dtqaegb@xxxxxxxxxx
It isn't a good point as it wouldn't happen.
The BNP wouldn't let any non white to their meetings.

You conveniently cut the bit where he said "any fireman". Who said
anything about a black fireman?

Gaz did, now do keep up!

No, you cut True Blue's post:-

Quote:-

"No. It's a good point. If a fireman - any fireman - were to be told
to go to a political rally, say the BNP, or the Labour party's rally,
should he be able to refuse? If a sodomite fireman refused to go to an
event because he claims the organisers are "homophobic", would he then
be disciplined and forced to attend political grooming sessions? "

Tch, tch. Slimey Sheldon caught lying AGAIN.

You'd let an Asian fireman at a BNP meeting wouldn't you Chris X, but maybe
not a Jew or a Slav.
s***


.

Quantcast