Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- From: Derek ^ <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:25:56 +0100
On Sun, 28 May 2006 14:03:33 +0100, Stephen Glynn
<nyeplm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I gather, but over what sort of range does this work? I know this
is how actually existing RFID devices work in shops and warehouses, but
that's only over a few metres at most.
Ca. 3 metres.
Could you scale it up to work
over a couple of kilometres so that the RFID chip, on being 'woken up',
has sufficient power to say 'Here I am' back to a base station a mile or
so down the road?
No.
The inverse square law would be invoked twice over.
To get the same power to the chip over 2km as compared to 2m would
require 1 million times the power. Unfortunately the chip would also
need to 1 million times the power to transmit the data back. So the
base station would need to transmit 10^12 times as much power.
I ask because I do not know.
Beware of other technologies such as the tag logging all of it's
movements derived by GPS and storing them 'till it came within range
of a reader and then downloading them as a burst of data.
Policemen could carry readers, and get the history of all your recent
movements. The tag could control access to all sorts of places and
services.
No tag - no joy,
DG
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- From: Stephen Glynn
- Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- References:
- Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- From: MM
- Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- From: Stephen Glynn
- Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- Prev by Date: Re: Was WWII an exciting experience for some?
- Next by Date: Re: no wonder our dork socialists so hate hitchens....he sees straight through them....
- Previous by thread: Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- Next by thread: Re: Removal of electronic tags, propaganda, and Serco
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|