Re: Manchester CPS go mad

Elvis wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:09:41 +0100, Stephen Glynn wrote:
<snip>
The alleged crime would be some form of public order offence, racially aggravated. That's fair enough; if the two lads were aged 18 and one of them persistently harassed the other, on racial grounds or any other, he'd probably find himself in court, and quite right too. Same as if two 18-year-olds get into a fight on their way home from the pub. What seems to me extraordinary is that the CPS should choose to prosecute a 10-year-old, whether for harassment or for common assault (which a playground fight certainly is) as a result of a scrap in the playground.

Steve

It's obviously a psyop to scare people, to cow tow etc. They ultimately
want us all living in fear - witness the permanent war on "terror" - from
all and sundry continually begging not to be prosecuted for breathing or
existing. The whole fucking country is going to hell in a hand basket and
you know who is carrying it.



I'm not at all sure about that. Given that the CPS not infrequently find it difficult, if not impossible, to do something reasonably simple like getting a prosecutor, the case papers and the witnesses to a magistrates' court all at the same time on the right day, and that, rather less frequently, they difficulty complying with pretty simple directions from Crown Court judges about serving case papers, I'm not very confident they're up to something complicated like participating in a psyop.

Steve
.

Loading