Re: So how come only Yank soldiers fighting in Iraq can be "Zionazis" but not British soldiers?


"Stephen Glynn" <stephen.glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Mp0Nf.42291$Fy4.25431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chris X wrote:

How does that explain the way Iraqis tried to burn British
soldiers a
few months back?

It does not attempt to 'explain' it......two totally disparate
incidents.
As for the Iraqis...they were simply attacking foreign
invaders....we'd do
the same (I hope).

Ah, does that mean we should kidnap a some Iraqis here in the UK
and
behead a couple of them in protest against their compatriots'
behaviour?

Seriously, I've always wondered why it's a cause for gloating
when
American soldiers, who've probably got no more desire to be in
Iraq
than have most British soldiers,
Bull*** - they LOVE it !

when it doesn't seem to cause some of our regular gloaters equal
glee when British soldiers get killed. We are, unfortunately,
on
the same side as the Americans, after all.
That doesn't make it right though, and only a spineless
blancmange
like you could think so.
You're clearly better informed about the views of American
soldiers
than am I; there was me thinking they were complaining --
particularly
the reservists -- about the extended tours of duty they're having
to
do in Iraq, but clearly I'm mistaken.
That's not a gripe about being asked to take part in a gross
violation
of international law and an illegal invasion - it's moaning about
having to spend so much time away from Momma.

Quite possibly so, Chris. As I said, you're clearly better informed
about the views of American soldiers than am I; all I have to go on
is
what I read, whereas you've obviously overcome your dislike of
Americans
and discussed the matter with several Americans serving out there.
No, based on what I've read. As you well know.

And I agree that our troops shouldn't be there. It's just that,
given that they are there, unfortunately, as allies of the
Americans,
I don't see why you don't have a good gloat when they get killed,
too.
Moronicans are the architects of this war.

Certainly, though with the enthusiastic support of Tony Blair.
When will you idiots learn that the bribed stooge of Moronica called
"Tony Blair" does not represent the views of the British people ?

However, I still don't see why you don't want to have a gloat about
British troops being killed as part of what you see as a gross
violation
of international law and an illegal invasion. Is their
participation
not just as culpable as that of the Americans, in your view?
No, they didn't join the armed forces to invade and occupy foreign
countries which posed us no threat. Moronicans, on the other hand,
have
no such qualms - being psychotic neanderthals.

I'm sure most American soldiers didn't join up in the hope of getting
to
invade foreign countries,
Of course they did - it's what Moronica has *done* for the past forty
years
or so.
And Britain has never invaded anybody, right?

Irrelevant ancient history. I'm not interested in past centuries and the
days of the "empire" and neither is anybody else, so button it.

The former Yugoslavia?

Again, more Moronican meddling and imperialism disguised as "peace keeping"
or "humanitarianism" with which treacherous British "governments" were happy
to assist. Your "point" was *what*, exactly ?


.

Quantcast