Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- From: hummingbird <ZYLYDWINUSED@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:29:18 +0000
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:14:06 GMT, Stephen Glynn
<stephen.glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...
>hummingbird wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:32:33 +0000 (UTC), "DVH" <dvh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...
>>
>>
>>>"Financial investors should pay new taxes to fund the European Union,
>>>Wolfgang Schüssel, the Austrian chancellor and new holder of the rotating EU
>>>presidency, said on Wednesday...
>>>
>>>Setting out his plans for the six-month Austrian EU presidency, Mr Schüssel
>>>said: "It can't be right that short-term financial speculation is not
>>>subject to taxation at all.
>>
>>
>> Why do you say Schüssel is an imbecile for saying this?
>>
>> I have long advocated such a tax on speculation although in my case
>> it's not to raise money but to deter short-term speculation which
>> unbalances markets and often has adverse effects on companies and
>> currencies etc.
>>
>> My own proposal has always been a tax on capital gain:
>> sell after 120 days - pay tax as normal
>> sell between 90-120 days - pay 25% tax
>> sell between 60-90 days - pay 50% tax
>> sell between 30-60 days - pay 75% tax.
>> sell within 30 days - pay 100% tax.
>>
>> Such action would help return markets to what they were originally
>> intended for: a place for investors in industry, instead of what they
>> have become: giant gambling casinos.
>>
>
>You misunderstand the way the futures markets work and what they're
>there for.
>
>Someone manufactures widgets. To do this he has to import materials
>from abroad (which he has to pay in dollars) and he sells his widgets
>all over the place, so he's getting paid in Euros, dollars and yen.
>
>Now, he knows all about widgets and the market for them, but he doesn't
>know much about what the currency and commodities markets are going to
>do over the next financial year. Nor does he like gambling the
>company's future on his best guess. Fortunately, there are people who
>make a living out of gambling on these markets.
>
>He, therefore, cranks up Excel, does his costings and works out what
>sort of costs for his components and raw materials he can live with and
>what sort of rate at which he needs to be able to sell the Euros,
>dollars etc that he gets paid for his products (or, if he insists on
>being paid in Stirling, what sort of exchange rates will need to prevail
>for his prices to remain competitive in these various overseas markets.
>
>Armed with this knowledge he goes out and tries to buy appropriate
>options from brokers on the futures market to buy his raw materials at a
>particular price at particular times and to buy and sell the expected
>amounts of currencies he'll be needing/being paid. At the end of the
>exercise, he's happy because he's managed, in effect, to insure himself
>against adverse commodity and currency movements.
>
>How's he done this? By finding people who're prepared to take on the
>risk on his behalf. How do they make their money? Partly from the
>fees he's paid, of course, but mostly from trading the options they've
>taken on. In other words, gambling, just as syndicates at Lloyds
>'gamble' on the risks of people's cars being stolen, houses burning down
>and their dropping dead in the street.
>
>Levy punitive 'windfall' taxes on top of what these dealers already pay
>in corporation tax, and all you'll succeed in doing is making life more
>difficult and expensive for the widget manufacturer.
My comments were aimed at the markets in general. I never mentioned
the futures markets specifically, so why you have provided a long
explanation of why people use them is a mystery.
IIRC from several years ago in the FT, only a small proportion of
currency transactions performed each day are trade related, the
rest are pure speculation as we saw with Soros some time back.
These daily currency transactions run into billions of dollars.
There remains a strong case to tax speculation in the markets but
the situation would never be black and white.
--
"It [Blair's government] has exploited the mood of insecurity
to push through a law protecting itself from public protest."
How freedom of speech is being curtailed in Britain under Blair:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2092-1937539,00.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- From: Stephen Glynn
- Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- References:
- Schüssel: Imbecile
- From: DVH
- Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- From: hummingbird
- Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- From: Stephen Glynn
- Schüssel: Imbecile
- Prev by Date: Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- Next by Date: Re: Boeing outsells Airbus in 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- Next by thread: Re: Schüssel: Imbecile
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|