Re: Yet more lies
- From: Maria <frustated@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:20:25 GMT
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:23:41 GMT, Stephen Glynn
<stephen.glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Maria wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:39:55 +0100, "Harry the Horse"
>> <HarryAtTheStable@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4291388.stm
>>>
>>>"Police later used powers under the Terrorism Act to prevent Mr Wolfgang's
>>>re-entry, but he was not arrested. "
>>>
>>>And the government promised that the anti-terrorism laws would not be used
>>>to stifle political dissent. And then also tell us that ID cards will not
>>>be used to attack the rights of innocent people. Yet another
>>>counter-example to the adage that "if you are innocent, you have nothing to
>>>fear".
>>>
>>
>>
>> They were going to use PT Acts to curb the fuel protest.
>
>And they'd have had a very good case in law; this from the Blood and
>Treasure blog:
Phew that's a relief - for a moment I thought it might be unlawful!
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Blair Should Face Standards Board
- Next by Date: Re: Hitchens: "Anti-War, My Foot- The Phony Peaceniks Who Marched On Washington"
- Previous by thread: Re: Blair Should Face Standards Board
- Next by thread: Re: Yet more lies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|