Re: Local elections
- From: "David North" <dnorth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 20:35:45 +0100
<rosenstiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:tqqdnVxCtt2FzTTSnZ2dnUVZ8gOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <6kVbNRQXVUqPFwzB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul
Hyett) wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2012 at 02:24:51, rosenstiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote
in uk.politics.electoral :
>>
>> Or vote for UKIP, etc...
>
>No different. Another way of wasting their votes and letting the Tory >in.
>
As opposed to voting for *you* and getting the Tories anyway??
The Tories are in Government because they got more votes and more seats than
any other party and no other party was prepared to lead a government in
2010.
That's a bit harsh, since no other party was in a realistic position to do so.
--
David North
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Local elections
- From: rosenstiel
- Re: Local elections
- References:
- Re: Local elections
- From: Paul Hyett
- Re: Local elections
- From: rosenstiel
- Re: Local elections
- Prev by Date: Re: Local elections
- Next by Date: Re: Local elections
- Previous by thread: Re: Local elections
- Next by thread: Re: Local elections
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|