Re: Income inequality again
- From: Dave Smith <davidelliottsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 03:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:45:08 AM UTC+1, Peter Brooks wrote:
Here's another angle, from TED:
http://roundtable.nationaljournal.com/2012/05/the-powerpoint-slides-that-wer.php?fb_ref=.T7VgIOsa4_U.like&fb_source=home_oneline
It's a pity that they cheat with the slide on tax rates - I'd have
hoped that even fairly mathematically challenged types would spot that
22 > 9, not less. It's a pity because it's the sort of thing that
tends to destroy the credibility of the whole, and it's an important
message.
Is that the slide showing a decline in millionaires' effective tax rates against a rise in unemployment? Correlation doesn't establish causation and an odd way to present the statistics?
Dave Smith
.
- References:
- Income inequality again
- From: Lance
- Re: Income inequality again
- From: Jim Hawkins
- Re: Income inequality again
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: Income inequality again
- From: Lance
- Re: Income inequality again
- From: Peter Brooks
- Income inequality again
- Prev by Date: Re: homosexuality obvious?
- Next by Date: The Righteous Mind
- Previous by thread: Re: Income inequality again
- Next by thread: Re: Kinsey was correct about a continuum of sexual orientation?
- Index(es):