Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 19 Jan 2006 21:38:40 -0800
9. Lance
Jan 20, 12:36 am show options
Newsgroups: uk.philosophy.humanism
From: "Lance" <lacheni...@xxxxxxxxxx> - Find messages by this author
Date: 19 Jan 2006 14:36:42 -0800
Local: Fri, Jan 20 2006 12:36 am
Subject: Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
I don't think "fuzzy" was a good name.
I also don't think that talking of degrees of truth is correct in this
context - rather it is a set of tools for dealing with categoies that
are vague (like "tall" or the famous philsophical problem of the heap).
-----
Yes, I think that those are both good points.
Incidentally, some of your posts, including the above, seem to have
disappeared from the saix server, but are still visible in google.
.
- References:
- The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: Lance
- Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: Peter H.M. Brooks
- Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: David Smith
- Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: Peter H.M. Brooks
- Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: David Smith
- Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- From: Lance
- The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- Prev by Date: Re: Positive Humanism
- Next by Date: Re: Positive Humanism
- Previous by thread: Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- Next by thread: Re: The principle of open debate and hearing both sides
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|