Re: A single gene for language?

Lance <lachenicht@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I agree. But I still thought the article was interesting.

I can see that (and that my response was a little grumpy), but as a
biologist there are too many unanswered questions of mechanism for it to
make a good story, yet.

Peter

--
Add my middle initial to email me. It has become attached to a country
.

Relevant Pages

  • the allegations, listeners, and stools are all appalling and secret
    ... broad and grumpy. ... Lawrence's court moves subject to our lie after we ... propose in response to the creative flights. ... Muhammad and Byron's conscious harmony. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • New Year - New Direction - Two Handmades for sale
    ... Highly figured walnut and Italian spruce Grand Auditorium by Lance ... Sweet modern tone, huge dynamic range. ... Quick response to light ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic)
  • Re: JRs ERDM
    ... I was expecting something more along ... > the lines of....Uncle Grumpy. ... I appreciate the response. ... BTW... ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Express BBS Pro setup
    ... The software is still licensed and is being sold by Lance w/ Video 61 ... Steve Carden has developed TCPIP Express and can be ... > response. ...
    (comp.sys.atari.8bit)
  • Re: Seperating 1 column into 2
    ... Lance, have a look at data, text to columns ... Always backup your data before trying something new ... Please post any response to the newsgroups so others can benefit from it ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)