Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: "Dave Smith" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Oct 2005 13:11:57 -0700
Perhaps you and Lance won't agree with the following quote from a
monograph by Antony Flew:
"Natural selection does not positively produce anything. It only
eliminates, or tends to eliminate, whatever is not competitive. For
some variant characteristic not to be eliminated, it does not need to
bestow upon its possessor any actual competitive advantage. It is both
necessary and sufficient that it should not burden that possessor with
any competitive disadvantage.
"Darwin's mistake -- a mistake the correction of which leaves us still
with a satisfactorily falsifiable implication -- is perhaps consequent
upon his employment of the expressions 'natural selection' or 'survival
of the fittest', rather than his own ultimately preferred alternative
'natural preservation'....Certainly it cannot be either too early or
too often emphasized that natural selection is no more a kind of
(conscious and grounded) selection than Bombay duck is a species of
duck."
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Milan
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Peter Ashby
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- References:
- Irreducible complexity
- From: Lance
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Peter Ashby
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Lance
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Lance
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: Irreducible complexity
- From: Peter Ashby
- Irreducible complexity
- Prev by Date: Re: Irreducible complexity
- Next by Date: Re: Irreducible complexity
- Previous by thread: Re: Irreducible complexity
- Next by thread: Re: Irreducible complexity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|