Science Disproves Evolution

Complex Molecules and Organs 1

Many molecules necessary for life, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins, are
so incredibly complex that claims they evolved are questionable.
Furthermore, those claims lack experimental support (a).

a. “There has never been a meeting, or a book, or a paper on details
of the evolution of complex biochemical systems.” Michael J. Behe,
Darwin’s Black Box (New York: The Free Press, 1996), p. 179.

“Molecular evolution is not based on scientific authority. There is no
publication in the scientific literature—in prestigious journals,
specialty journals, or book—that describes how molecular evolution of
any real, complex, biochemical system either did occur or even might
have occurred. There are assertions that such evolution occurred, but
absolutely none are supported by pertinent experiments or
calculations. Since no one knows molecular evolution by direct
experience, and since there is no authority on which to base claims of
knowledge, it can truly be said that—like the contention that the
Eagles will win the Super Bowl this year—the assertion of Darwinian
molecular evolution is merely bluster.” Behe, pp. 186–187.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences11.html#wp1008873

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Most important paper in evolutionary biology
    ... > ball park of being correct in its inferences. ... > as an upright walking ape-like hominid that the controversy pretty much ... > molecular evolution studies. ... > the fact that they had the wrong idea of molecular evolution. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Science Disproves Evolution
    ... publication in the scientific literature—in prestigious journals, ... There are assertions that such evolution occurred, ... Since no one knows molecular evolution by direct ...
    (alt.religion.christian)