Re: Incest

From: Ian Smith <news0807REMOVECAPS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 08:49:49 +0100

Jim Hawkins wrote:

"Ian Smith" <news0807REMOVECAPS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:i5WdnSfttoWLVabVnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jim Hawkins wrote:
Now that the ancient religious nonsense of blasphemy has, at
long last, been removed from the statute book, is it too much
to hope that another such absurdity, the 'offence' of
consensual adult incest, will be given the boot too ?

Jim Hawkins

What has this to do with uk.philosophy.atheism?

Unlike flying fish, of course.

Absolutely. Flying fish is appropriate as an excellent example of evolution (a fish that has developed partial flight capability) and relates to the ongoing debate (?) in this group with creationists about science and evolution.

regards, Ian
.

References:
- Incest
  - From: Jim Hawkins
- Re: Incest
  - From: Ian Smith
- Re: Incest
  - From: Jim Hawkins

Prev by Date: Re: Incest
Next by Date: Re: Incest
Previous by thread: Re: Incest
Next by thread: Re: Incest
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Incest
... to hope that another such absurdity, the 'offence' of ... consensual adult incest, will be given the boot too? ... Jim Hawkins ... stiff penalties to enforce it because of the atheists tenet of Moral ...
(uk.philosophy.atheism)
Re: Incest
... to hope that another such absurdity, the 'offence' of ... consensual adult incest, will be given the boot too? ... Jim Hawkins ...
(uk.philosophy.atheism)
Re: Incest
... Jim Hawkins wrote: ... to hope that another such absurdity, the 'offence' of ... consensual adult incest, will be given the boot too? ...
(uk.philosophy.atheism)