Re: thanks to UPH
- From: "Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <femail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 03:17:56 +0100
Ken wrote:
On May 26, 2:24 pm, Ian Smith <news0807REMOVEC...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
IlBeBa...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Any compromising has to be done by religion to come to terms with
reality.
REPLY: Real, true , and honest Science....goes where the evidence
leads ; and not making everything FIT natural and accidental
causes. You dont get a highly tweaked Universe like ours from a
blind random explosion and you dont get personality traits from
leftover materials of an explosion and you dont get DNA with
intelligent messages from a bunch of dead chemicals from a 'Soup
Pond' . You know that as well as I do. Its just that one of us is
willing to make smokescreens so they can delay admitting to the
obvious : A personal , intelligent, very powerful, AND MORAL
Creator . ( not a very pleasant consideration for many...)
So, present this evidence to us then?
Where is any of this real, positive, credible, convincing evidence?
regards, Ian
Once again the only "evidence" is "his opinion".............which
should not be considered credible coming from someone who doesn't even
understand the basics of fusion
....or litmus paper.
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers
.
- References:
- thanks to UPH
- From: mark
- Re: thanks to UPH
- From: Christopher A . Lee
- Re: thanks to UPH
- From: IlBeBauck@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: thanks to UPH
- From: Ian Smith
- Re: thanks to UPH
- From: Ken
- thanks to UPH
- Prev by Date: Re: thanks to UPH
- Next by Date: Re: thanks to UPH
- Previous by thread: Re: thanks to UPH
- Next by thread: Re: thanks to UPH
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|