Re: There are NO intellligent Xtians, if we use Dimwit Dave,Pastor...




"Dave in Lake Villa" <DaveInLakeVilla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7021-471104AD-324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Still waiting for Ken to start talking like a real bonified professional
scientist to give a very detailed explanation for these chemicals (over
100), laws of science, and razor edge parameters of physics (133 +) so
we could be here living on our planet...in a cogent claritive manner

Do you know that Michael Behe and all of the leaders of churches in the USA
have recently accepted, by their own admission, that the 78,243 coincidences
there would need to be between the known facts of evolution and the supposed
guesses of enemies of science are now known to be so unlikely that the facts
must be accepted as true and the guesses must therefore be false?

Do you know that the likelihood that a living thing will be created by a
person in a laboratory test tube demonstrating quite certainly that life was
the inevitable result of quite simple chemical processes, very soon, that
all fundamental Christians have been told that it is foolish to carry on
claiming that it could not have happened by chance because it will not be
long before it is demonstrated on live TV?

Do you know that creationist leaders have issued the word that all followers
should immediately stop claiming that condtions on Earth are so perfectly
correct for life that there must be a God, because it is now realised that
quite soon life will be found on another world and that world will be
completely unlike the Earth except that chemistry will be the same, thus
disproving that faulty argument?

Do you now that Christians who are also scientists now know that the DNA of
pond scum is so similar to humans that we are related?


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... Because the line between life and non-life is blurred, ... deduction from the evidence is deduction from the evidence - i.e. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: There are NO intellligent Xtians, if we use Dimwit Dave,Pastor...
    ... scientist to give a very detailed explanation for these chemicals (over ... guesses of enemies of science are now known to be so unlikely that the facts ... person in a laboratory test tube demonstrating quite certainly that life was ... Do you now that Christians who are also scientists now know that the DNA of ...
    (uk.philosophy.atheism)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... Because the line between life and non-life is blurred, ... DNA strands. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
    ... scientists who with their knowledge have a lot more humility about these ... sweeping claims about how life began. ... You admit that science can not provide ... materialism. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... "spark of life" which separates living from non-living things. ... It's only a blurred line to scientists who keep changing the ... school board perhaps, wish to define life, or science for that matter, ... odds of strands of DNA coming together for the first time? ...
    (talk.origins)

Loading