Re: original sin and evolution


< "Phil Saunders" <philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:RRnvi.33852

You havent shown that something arises from nothing. >

That is precisely what I have shown, or at least have given a decent enough
explanation. The fact is, this was settled rather a long time ago, and it
is not sensible to deny it. (It causes the Casimir effect, and Hawking
radiation among other things.)

I have also explained that huge amounts of matter and energy can actually
sum to zero, to show how 'something out of nothing' is still, in sum,
nothing.

Perhaps most difficult of all is to understand the probabilistic nature of
some events. If three mutually exclusive events are equally likely, the one
which happens is not 'caused' in the conventional sense. Run it over and
over again with identical conditions and the same event will occur only
about a third of the time.

If you really are interested in this, rather than just shutting your eyes
and sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting 'taint so', I recommend
a good look at the polarisation of light.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: original sin and evolution
    ... enough explanation. ... No you havent, had you shown it I would have seen it. ... sum to zero, to show how 'something out of nothing' is still, in sum, ... Zero states arent nothing, nor are they causeless. ...
    (uk.philosophy.atheism)
  • Re: Counting # of days between 2 dates excluding Fri & Sat)
    ... I mean, yeah sure, I know what INT, MOD, SUM and WEEKDAY do. ... You subtract this from that then add this then subtract that and divide by ... this but what kind of an explanation is that? ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)
  • Re: Lennys 1965 Mahler 1 Posted
    ... > Here's an explanation that I saw elsewhere and thought was an excellent ... > and write that sum on another piece of paper. ... > cabinet and leave the paper with 3 numbers on my desk. ... I go to the file cabinet, retrieve the piece of paper ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: Jacobian determinant and inverse function theorem
    ... this is a very clear explanation indeed. ... det is a sum of products of a sign function and matrix entries (which ... Define on the n-fold product U^of U, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: #DIV/0! - why
    ... sorry i think i messed up in my explanation. ... sum is one the average is another, i also find the mean, mode etc. ... cj21's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=25673 ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)