Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: stumper <stumper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:03:05 -0400
Gary wrote:
On May 10, 3:26 pm, stumper <stum...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:arthur wrote:The message <463e6b53$0$8741$ed261...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>How about those people
from "Steve Marshall" <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> contains these words:
"arthur" <art...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wroteI shouldn't have used the word 'confused'. I meant, willing to talk andNo: I would say, don't reply. If they are confused, rather than justThey may not show confusion. Often they try and a present a case that
ranting, then point out the confusion but don't address them directly.
atheism can offer nothing of value, saying it has nothing to base morality
on etc etc. If left unchallenged people that look in may think we have no
answer. I think we should refute such claims and, as you suggest, avoid a
flame war.
Steve M
listen, as opposed to doing their religious duty, bearing witness, etc.*
People who are interested in dialogue deserve a courteous reply.
However, if they're just proclaiming the religious viewpoint, then I
think it's best to avoid replying to them; you'd simply comment on their
views, but not address them. (After all, they are not really talking to
you.)
who absolutely do not believe in God
when they have no idea what it is?
Are they really atheists?
--
~Stumper- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Do you think people who don't believe in XimXim, where XimXim is
something I have just made up, are irrational to disbelieve in it? I
have no idea what XimXim is - and noone has any idea who or what God
is. There is no evidence for God. There is no information available
about God. The Bible and Koran do not give evidence, since they are
authenticated by the very mythical creature they are supposed to
document. The God of the philosophers is as Anthony Kenny pointed out,
an impossible construction having properties than cannot logically
coexist. So God is in no way different from XimXim.
Lance
Do we have any reason to be hopeful?
Even in a Nazi concentration camp?
Would it be logical and reasonable?
--
~Stumper
.
- References:
- why reply to silly posts?
- From: arthur
- Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: Steve Marshall
- Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: arthur
- Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: Steve Marshall
- Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: arthur
- Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: stumper
- Re: why reply to silly posts?
- From: Gary
- why reply to silly posts?
- Prev by Date: Re: why reply to silly posts?
- Next by Date: 'the Christian Enlightenment'?
- Previous by thread: Re: why reply to silly posts?
- Next by thread: The religious attempt to do 'research' again..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|