Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rowland McDonnell)
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:47:30 +0000
nigel <useweb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
When I was proof-reading technical documentation, obviously
'nit-picking' was something to be carried to extreme lengths otherwise
customers or readers might get incorrect information.
Did you take the trouble to proof-read backwards for spelling and then
forward for sense?
(that's the old-fashioned full-on job of proof-reading - which I never
bothered to do, 'cos it's *incredibly* tedious and after all I had a
spelling checker and they catch most spelling errors).
[snip]
One thing I really, really, REALLY hate is when you can't tell which
character is speaking or to whom :(
It's sometimes exactly the right thing - but only in the case of trippy
psychadelic heavy SF type stuff if you ask me. Most people can't write
that sort of thing.
There are a few sites and groups which offer advice and feedback on
stories written by newbies. They can be a bit difficult to track down
but might be worth it if you want independent, constructive advice. A
word of warning though. Because the aim of these places is to be
supportive, any ratings they assign can be very misleading (eg 9.1 -
dross, 9.5 - average, 9.9 - rather good - against a stated 'average' of 5.0)
I mistrust any attempt to judge writing using a numerical score.
Rowland.
--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
.
- References:
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Loz
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Evil_Nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Evil_Nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Evil_Nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Evil_Nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: Mandy
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- From: nigel
- Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- Prev by Date: Re: Rowland's continuing obsession with John DoH
- Next by Date: Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- Previous by thread: Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- Next by thread: Re: Children - OT, sorry!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|