Re: Bloody social services - again.
- From: Evil_Nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:52:39 -0800 (PST)
x-no-archive: yes
On Jan 31, 6:28 pm, real-address-in-...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rowland
McDonnell) wrote:
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jan/31/socialcare.nhs>
`Social workers who were forced by a judge to return a newborn baby to
his teenage mother will today make another attempt to take the boy into
care.
The 18-year-old woman won back her son yesterday lunchtime after
obtaining an emergency high court order that ruled social workers had
broken the law when they removed the baby at 4am yesterday, two hours
after his birth.'
Rowland.
It was in my daily tabloid. Made me smile - a bloody nose for the bad
guys :)
The trouble is they won't learn - the judge made it clear that the kid
was in no immediate danger yet the bastards are having another go at
kidnapping it today.
It's disgraceful that social services think depression is grounds to
steal children. There are several posters here who have successfully
raised kids depite being a hostage to the illness.
Evil Nigel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bloody social services - again.
- From: Christina Websell
- Re: Bloody social services - again.
- References:
- Bloody social services - again.
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Bloody social services - again.
- Prev by Date: Re: My destiny will remain unknown
- Next by Date: Re: OT - Not as smart as I thought
- Previous by thread: Bloody social services - again.
- Next by thread: Re: Bloody social services - again.
- Index(es):