Re: ship-of-fools
- From: Isla <thistle123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:25:27 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 29, 6:13 pm, real-address-in-...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rowland
McDonnell) wrote:
Isla <thistle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Every place needs 'commandments' - without any at all we are well and
truly lost.
That's a point of view that every anarchist ever disputes. Anarchists
point out that you don't need imposed rules of the `commandment' type -
especially not the typical lists of commandments.
Rowland.
--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry - the spam got to mehttp://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
.....and our prisons are full of people who don't follow any
commandments :)...ok! Most of us at some point will have rebelled
against imposed rules, ( commanding things doesn't necessarily mean we
have to sit back and never question them ), but I just feel that chaos
descends otherwise, with too many individuals fighting to impose their
own 'rules' - it becomes a power struggle. ( and no, I haven't always
followed the rules throughout life, but knowing that they are there
provides some kind of incentive and comfort, dare I say? )
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ship-of-fools
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: ship-of-fools
- From: Ooby dooby
- Re: ship-of-fools
- References:
- ship-of-fools
- From: Mal
- Re: ship-of-fools
- From: Isla
- Re: ship-of-fools
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- ship-of-fools
- Prev by Date: Re: Why
- Next by Date: Re: ship-of-fools
- Previous by thread: Re: ship-of-fools
- Next by thread: Re: ship-of-fools
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|