Re: Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- From: real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rowland McDonnell)
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:11:27 +0000
Rosy <rosyposy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Not got much to say, but...
> We've finally convince him that he didn't just fall asleep. But he is
> being difficult about going to the Quack, and reckons I am forcing him.
> Actually I am barely talking to him about it - he just senses my
> feelings on the matter.
Hmm. That'll make things worse. Needs talking about openly. Leave it
on `sensing feelings', and - well... doesn't work. Dunno what does.
Why not explain that, basically, what it is is that you're terrified
he's going to snuff it like the previous fella and you're going to be
worried until he's been checked out? Even if you've explained that
before, you've still got a bad atmosphere hanging around, right? Right.
Caveat: I am no expert at personal relationships. On the other hand, I'm
married and no spring chicken.
Good luck and all that.
Rowland.
--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP pub key 0x62DCCA78 Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org
UK biker? Join MAG and help keep bureaucracy at bay
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- From: Rosy
- Re: Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- References:
- Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- From: Rosy
- Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- Prev by Date: Re: Families what are they good for
- Next by Date: Re: Rock music like you've never heard it before.
- Previous by thread: Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- Next by thread: Re: Gloom (spoiler - downer)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
