Re: Base64 encoding?
- From: Ali <ali.on_usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:51:45 GMT
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:37:11 GMT, ned commented
Now what's all that about?
I received an unsolicited e-mail t'other day and, as is my wont, did a
rt click, properties, detail, message source,
on it.
Up came a great block of base64 encoded AlphaNumeric characters.
'Found a site that would decode it all
and it turned out to be HTML for a website offering me a website
'ranking' service - for FREE!
Unasked for FREE services I can do without.
But, what are the pros and cons of Base64 encoding?
For text (including HTML) there are no pros (except that the recipient
can't read it in a simple text viewer), but it is useful for encoding
non-text (so-called binary) files, since email, like nntp, is 7-bit
ascii.
The major con is that every 3 bytes in the original take 4 bytes when
encoded.
Is it just a dodge to hide what is on offer, hoping you will open it
just out of curiosity?
It may be a dodge, or it may just be lazy coding of the sending email
client - encode everything in Base64 whether it needs it or not.
--
Ali
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/my.web.pages/ Don't go there.
UPS/FUNTO Feb stats: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/my.web.pages/stats/
Nearly six years' statistics now available.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Base64 encoding?
- From: ned
- Re: Base64 encoding?
- References:
- Base64 encoding?
- From: ned
- Base64 encoding?
- Prev by Date: Suzi's back...
- Next by Date: Re: Suzi's back...
- Previous by thread: Re: Base64 encoding?
- Next by thread: Re: Base64 encoding?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|