Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- From: "Rabbit" <Rabbit_is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:25:50 -0000
"wtwjgc" <joee2.20.wtwjgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p_euj.9233$XI.7977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It takes me straight to the article.
Tried again and it's a cookie issue. Seems I'd got them blocked for NY
Times, but I've sorted that * for the moment* :-)
No, this is something different.
Quote from part of article:-
In a way that's more worrying to me than the link I posted. I don't want
ads, which is why most of them are blocked here. I don't want my details
passed on to ad companies and I wouldn't want to be blackmailed by *security
incentives*. Unfortunately I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the norm
for all ISPs :-(
--
Sandra
People will forget what you said.
People will forget what you did, but
People will never forget how you made them feel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- From: wtwjgc
- Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- References:
- ISP's to monitor browsing
- From: wtwjgc
- Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- From: Rabbit
- Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- From: wtwjgc
- ISP's to monitor browsing
- Prev by Date: Re: Missing person
- Next by Date: Re: It's like painting the ... erm ... the erm ...
- Previous by thread: Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- Next by thread: Re: ISP's to monitor browsing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading