Re: Ping pmj
- From: corbei@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:58:06 +0100
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:00:05 +0100, corbei@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Further to this I have just looked and there is a section
for neetmeeting which gives the following rule
Protocol Port Start Port End Port Map
TCP,UDP 1024 1064 1024 TCP
1503 1503 1503
TCP 1720 1720 1720
TCP 1731 1731 1731
TCP 522 522 522
TCP 389 389 389
I will give you a call
No response so far, busy I would guess.
When I looked in the modem set up those that you adjusted had gone. I
then applied the rule for netmeeting and it has stayed in place but
according to GRC there are some big holes in my security for all the
obove ports. Shouldnt be a real problem as most people who use netmeet
must have similar setup.
Can you let me know when it will be convenient to try again. No rush.
- Prev by Date: Re: Paraphrasing Benny Hill..
- Next by Date: Re: Hot weather tip
- Previous by thread: Re: Ping pmj
- Next by thread: Re: Ping pmj