Re: What kind of people are you
- From: "Wally" <not@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:23:05 +0100
"Jim Spriggs" <jim.sprigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43555FB3.D3A49CF1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Wally wrote:
> >
> > Take the test
> >
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/mind/surveys/whatamilike/index.shtml
>
> I have two questions:
>
> (1) Is it necessary to take a test in order to discover what kind of
> person one is? I can appreciate that if you had to decide what kind of
> person someone _else_ was you might wish to test them (though what test
> you would use, I have no idea) but why would you test yourself?
>
> (2) Who says that "kind of person" means just what the compilers of
> these questions say it means?
We all know it is meaningless Jim, it's called having a bit of fun,
probably not of your approval but it passes the time and sometimes
gives most of us a laugh (I hope).
Why not try joining in sometime, who knows, you may even find
yourself smiling.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What kind of people are you
- From: Splodge
- Re: What kind of people are you
- References:
- What kind of people are you
- From: Wally
- Re: What kind of people are you
- From: Jim Spriggs
- What kind of people are you
- Prev by Date: Re: What kind of people are you
- Next by Date: Re: Local telly from ITV
- Previous by thread: Re: What kind of people are you
- Next by thread: Re: What kind of people are you
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|