Re: I can't be that old!!!!
- From: "Rabbit" <Rabbit_is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:24:55 +0100
"Flyiñg Ñuñ 2°°5 +" <flyingnun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3q5222Fcpo7cU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I certainly am aren't I? Sign of the times. They were also discussing
> marriage on Radio Sheffield this morning. To me it's unbelivable the
> number of people who are having families out of wedlock and not even
> considering tying the knot. I feel sorry for the genealogists of the
> future in trying to trace the family trees. :(
I have this vision that with so many children born today without a father's
name ( if known) on the birth certificate future genealogists will discover
sisters married to brothers, fathers married to daughters etc :-(
--
Sandra
People will forget what you said.
People will forget what you did, but
People will never forget how you made them feel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I can't be that old!!!!
- From: Oldrose
- Re: I can't be that old!!!!
- References:
- I can't be that old!!!!
- From: BunnyHare
- Re: I can't be that old!!!!
- From: Flyiñg Ñuñ 2°°5 +
- I can't be that old!!!!
- Prev by Date: Re: G.M.T. Friday 30th September 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Fill in the gaps (warning for non f**tball fans)
- Previous by thread: Re: I can't be that old!!!!
- Next by thread: Re: I can't be that old!!!!
- Index(es):