Re: Is this legal them was Re: Goth Weekend Photos (Originally Taken For The Whitby Gazette & Sexy Sunday Website)


"H Duffy" <hester_duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3uj951F11pc9cU3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dm1n5j$6ul$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:3uh5siF10fpd7U2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> you have you have denied PeeBee the right to sell his pictures
>>>> taken at and of WGW
>>>
>>> And that has nothing to do with free copies of anything.
>> yes it does you have only denied him the right to sell pictures,
>
> That's right. If he wants to make them available online (which he has
> done)
> no-one objects, but no-one is demanding that he make prints and distribute
> them for free, which is what you're suggesting.

I'm not you are you have said that you don't like him selling his pictures
well
it's relly got *** all to do with you, not that he was selling them anyway
but of course you can't understand the difference can you, but it was a
3rd party that was selling them if someone requested that they
wanted the image on either paper, mug t-shirt or whatever.
Why can't a person have such an item ?


>> as seen Marge requested a copy but you said he can;'t sell them
>> so what should he do deny the model or person in the picture
>> a copy or provide it for free.
>
> Send her a digital copy, you moron. That way, it doesn't cost anyone any
> money, does it?
You can't drunk tea out of a digital copy you idiot, you can't wear a
digital t-shirt
And for those that haven't a computer on-line at home, what about them.
Lots of people still keep albums for photos it's not entirely died out just
yet.


> No, I'm suggesting that if they're not available online, you don't get a
> copy. If they are online, then no-one has to pay for a copy, so it's not
> selling them, but it also doesn't incur extra costs for the photographer.

But it does £5 per month check out the details on the site.

>
>>> What gives me the right to say that I don't think he should sell photos
>>> of people who don't want him to sell photos of them? Erm, exactly the
>>> same thing that gives you the right to disagree, you moron.
>>
>> As pathetic as usual, you've once again lost the plot.
>
> No, Dave, you're suggesting that I'm physically or legally preventing
> Peebee
> from doing something, when in fact I'm simply entering into a discussion
> about it, just as you are. Do you understand that?

You have said that he shouldn't be selling the pictures you have also said
that
he dosen't own copyright of the pictures and you are WRONG on that too.

A photographer can sell their work if they wish too, it's not your place
to tell them they can't.


.