Re: Theaving Goths
- From: "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:20:16 +0100
"Pyromancer" <dj.pyromancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1127400939.771879.263480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Paul Kinsler wrote:
>> Bottled water (expensive) vs Tap water (nearly free). Can anyone make
>> an economic comparison between the two products and their suppliers?
>
> That entirely depends on where you're drinking it. I once had the
> misfortune to taste London tap water directly (at St Pancras Station,
> about 1986), and I swore I'd never drink it again. I suspect you could
> bottle cat pee and it would still taste better than London tap water,
> so comparing a free product that tastes vile with a more expensive one
> that tastes pleasant isn't really a fair comparason.
Funnily enough, Food and Drink did a taste and chemicals test some years ago
on several brands of bottled water, and tap water from several different
areas of the country. London water came out as one of the healthiest and on
the of the best-tasting overall.
H
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: the Girl who wanted to be God
- Re: Theaving Goths
- References:
- Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: David Damerell
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: vampire division
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: vampire division
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Pyromancer
- Theaving Goths
- Prev by Date: Re: Theaving Goths
- Next by Date: Re: Theaving Goths
- Previous by thread: Re: Theaving Goths
- Next by thread: Re: Theaving Goths
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|