Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Dag <dagwast@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:38:48 +0200
Pyromancer wrote:
Paul Kinsler wrote:
Bottled water (expensive) vs Tap water (nearly free). Can anyone make an economic comparison between the two products and their suppliers?
That entirely depends on where you're drinking it. I once had the misfortune to taste London tap water directly (at St Pancras Station, about 1986), and I swore I'd never drink it again. I suspect you could bottle cat pee and it would still taste better than London tap water, so comparing a free product that tastes vile with a more expensive one that tastes pleasant isn't really a fair comparason.
I've never lived in a place where the tap water wasn't drinkable. Even when I lived in England (Surrey) the tap water was fine. Yet all these places I've lived have sold bottled water in a number of varieties in the store.
Dag
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Darkfire
- Re: Theaving Goths
- References:
- Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: David Damerell
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: vampire division
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: vampire division
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Pyromancer
- Theaving Goths
- Prev by Date: Re: Theaving Goths
- Next by Date: Re: Theaving Goths
- Previous by thread: Re: Theaving Goths
- Next by thread: Re: Theaving Goths
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|